General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNew York magazine - 90 percent of what you see on the internet is advertising in disguise
Interesting and long article from Vulture (New York Magazine)
That viral song, movie, meme, influencer, and celebrity drama was probably the product of a stealth marketing campaign.
Joe Lim estimates that 90 percent of what you see on the internet is advertising in disguise, and he should know. For three years, Lim ran a company called Floodify, which at its peak operated 65,000 dummy social-media accounts used to drum up attention on behalf of paying clients. On a typical day, he says, Floodify posted 50,000 videos across TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, and X, all of them designed to pass for the unscripted output of ordinary users.
We promoted music for all the major record labels, says Lim, 29, who lives in San Francisco. We worked with a top-five celebrity I cant name. We got 40 million views for an artist with just a hundred thousand followers.
Floodifys services were in demand in politics, too. When Eric Adams was running for reelection, his team asked me to do a campaign with videos of AI-generated influencers shitting on Mamdani: This grocery-store idea is bullshit. Lim says he turned down the Adams job not out of principle but because a consultant working with the campaign stopped replying to his emails. (Eric Adamss former chief of staff Frank Carone tells me, I have no knowledge about this, but I would have encouraged it.)
The point of this kind of marketing is that nobody is supposed to notice it. But lately, the machinery has started to show.
Continued:
https://www.vulture.com/article/social-media-feeds-chaotic-good-projects-clipping.html
https://archive.ph/PfWXv
Absolutely read this
— Molly Jong-Fast (@mollyjongfast.bsky.social) 2026-05-16T12:32:38.664Z
www.vulture.com/article/soci...
highplainsdem
(63,058 posts)with the prediction that in a few years, as people become more skeptical of what they see on social media, the advertisers will instead find ways to target the personal AI agents that the AI companies want people to become dependent on, and then those AI agents will "teach humans what they want."
LearnedHand
(5,590 posts)dalton99a
(95,209 posts)LearnedHand
(5,590 posts)But clearly not. This is so cynically discouraging. I always knew advertisers considered humans to be enemies who needed conquering, but this is a battlefield of which I was unaware.
LakeVermilion
(1,641 posts)its good to be 80. Im sure the young will adapt.
RockRaven
(19,739 posts)In case anyone missed it:
https://www.reuters.com/investigations/meta-is-earning-fortune-deluge-fraudulent-ads-documents-show-2025-11-06/
Social media algorithmically-driven feeds are a blight. The posts are fake, the trends are fake, the ads are fake. It is all full of fakery. To make money off of YOU. Be offended. Stop being a tool.
IcyPeas
(25,779 posts)The article is maddening.
Holy shi... :
And this:
... the spirit of the policy.... sheesh
dalton99a
(95,209 posts)GenThePerservering
(3,696 posts)that we're all product? It hasn't changed, it's just been amplified.
pecosbob
(8,489 posts)A veritable gilded age of deception and lies.