General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsdoj tells judge he could bulldoze teh statue of liberty and theres nothing they can do
If the govt decides very quickly to bulldoze the Statue of Liberty, the people whose ancestors that was the first thing they saw coming to this country, but the govt moved too fast nothing can be done?" she asked
The DOJ lawyer's response: "I think that's right, yes."
https://www.rawstory.com/trump-bulldoze-statue-of-liberty/
PCIntern
(28,689 posts)Raven123
(7,964 posts)moonshinegnomie
(4,106 posts)Submariner
(13,467 posts)relieve one's bladder fully and completely like it was never drained before.
The gravesite will likely have to be on a hill, and engineered to have proper drainage to protect down gradient estuaries, fisheries, and wetlands that recharge groundwater drinking supplies.
Jerry2144
(3,349 posts)From all the flow
ToxMarz
(3,109 posts)or just leave yellow comments.
ColoringFool
(1,229 posts)MyOwnPeace
(17,643 posts)tRump's EPA won't give a flying rat's ass about any of that stuff!
Jimi du Ranty
(60 posts)The urea could be processed into ammonia and used to power ships...
Mr. Evil
(3,478 posts)The gift of eloquence and good luck for all those who piss on that grave.
sop
(19,586 posts)it to rubble, haul it all away, then declare the property a contaminated Superfund site so nothing could be built there for the next hundred years?
MyOwnPeace
(17,643 posts)Hitting him where it hurts (even if he doesn't know it!)!
Captain Zero
(8,961 posts)Solely to investigate white collar tax fraud, and federal sex trafficking crimes.
MyOwnPeace
(17,643 posts)His own property with IRS on the front - what a brilliant idea!!!!!!
Hey Joe
(852 posts)filth, greed and avarice against the people of the world who are not billionaires.
So theres that.
Justice matters.
(10,141 posts)Democratic Presidents have a functioning brain.
BlueTsunami2018
(5,104 posts)These people can do just about anything they want without consequence.
If they did decide to knock down the Statue of Liberty, who would stop it from happening?
PittBlue
(4,842 posts)He is destroying everything with absolutely no consequences.
ornotna
(11,581 posts)And state of New York and the people there would have something to say.
And Im sure they would mobilize rather quickly.
LT Barclay
(3,215 posts)twodogsbarking
(19,534 posts)dave99
(325 posts)This IS New York City
popsdenver
(2,716 posts)and have prepared for it...........it would give them the provocation to enact the Insurrection Act, over ride the Posse Commatatus Act, instantly install Martial Law across the entire nation....in addition to starting a civil war, and basically causing anarchy in the U.S.
Think about this.........Why do you think that they have established a fortress of armed Protection in Washington D.C......with the National Guard, ATF, FBI, Secret Service, ICE, Border Patrol.....all patrolling the streets of DC??????? They saw what a crowd of 5,000 MAGAots did on J6th, and worry about an even bigger crowd of us, swarming over the Capitol, Supreme Court, and White House...
Also, think about this: for their "Coup De Gras" (sp?), they could crash the stock/investment market and instantaneously crash the entire U.S. Economy, RETIREMENT FUNDS, Social Security, SSI Disability Funds, Medicare and Medicaid, and turn the majority of citizens into Serfs and Peasants......There are oligarchs, etc that are already leaving investments and buying any and all Real Estate and land they can.......Look no further than Denver........Countless ABANDONED corporate buildings and skyscrapers in Down Town Denver, and the Tech Center, but there is a massive build out of residential apartments and residential sky scrapers......everywhere......
The only reason "they" aren't converting the abandoned commercial/corporate buildings into residences, is that it is cost prohibitive to convert them into apartments.......far cheaper to buy and scrape small buildings and start from scratch....
Their intent is to establish a second GILDED AGE, complete with a new set of ROBBER BARRONS............
Read or Re-Read Steinbeck's pulitzer prize winning; GRAPES OF WRATH about the struggle of citizens of the U.S. during the Great Depression........
While the U.S. citizens were struggling, day to day, just to find food for the day, and living in massive Hoovervilles,
much like todays homeless encampments, the Corporations were drowning in profits........
Every day, I watch Trump and these "new" Republicans, to see if they have renamed the United States of America....to the
United Corporations of America........
MustLoveBeagles
(17,776 posts)Raven123
(7,964 posts)struggle4progress
(126,852 posts)Ponietz
(4,486 posts)ChicagoTeamster
(1,327 posts)him or her off to the dungeon
ancianita
(43,402 posts)is recognized globally as a "masterpiece of the human spirit" and a universal symbol of freedom, democracy, and human rights.
TheRickles
(3,550 posts)A serious question, sadly enough.
ancianita
(43,402 posts)Yes, the US recognizes UNESCO as a legitimate entity, though the relationship has been politically turbulent.
The US is a founding member of UNESCO, and formally rejoined as the 194th member state in July 2023. However, the US has withdrawn from the organization twice, most recently in 2025.
It's true that United States first withdrew from UNESCO on December 31, 1984.
The withdrawal was announced a year earlier by the Reagan administration in December 1983, citing concerns over the organization's perceived politicization, poor management, and anti-Western biases.
The U.S. rejoined the organization nearly two decades later in October 2003.
The fact that the US was a founding member for 39 years stands as proof of US commitment to UNESCO's international standing. Americans would go apoplectic if this administration made even one move to remove it, nevermind New York, which was the first capital of the United States.
This bogus threat-drama simply makes this administration look unworthy as international leaders.
Justice matters.
(10,141 posts)institution.
FakeNoose
(42,681 posts)

(photo credits from Wikipedia)
Justice matters.
(10,141 posts)Jacson6
(2,252 posts)kimbutgar
(27,630 posts)responsible for millions of people dying from diseases that were eradicated but he instead was ok with committing genocide and returning concentration camps that a lot of people died in!
EarthAbides
(474 posts)I have a Statue of Liberty to sell you! Every state a democrat wins, Senate or House, will be declared rigged. Johnson won't swear in any democrats. Neither will Thune. Landslides will not matter. If it is a blue state, it will not matter. The whole world hates the fascist pig, but he is still in power. Wake up....
twodogsbarking
(19,534 posts)MyOwnPeace
(17,643 posts)'Wagon Wheel' (I heard the joke a different way!).
orleans
(37,285 posts)Legally and logistically, the Trump administration cannot unilaterally destroy or demolish the Statue of Liberty, as doing so would violate federal laws like the National Historic Preservation Act and require explicit legislative approval from Congress. (link #1)
However, this question stems from a literal, hypothetical exchange in a June 2026 federal appeals court hearing regarding the limits of executive power.
The June 2026 Court Argument
During a hearing before the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals concerning a lawsuit over the construction of a new White House ballroom, Department of Justice (DOJ) lawyers argued that the courts lack the authority to halt executive construction or demolition projects.
The Judge's Question: Judge Patricia Millett asked the DOJ what would happen if the administration decided to "very quickly bulldoze the Statue of Liberty" before anyone could stop it.
The DOJ's Response: The government attorney responded, "I think that's right, yes," implying that under their legal theory of executive speed, the courts would have no power to undo or stop the action after the fact.
The Legal Framework
While the administration's legal argument pushes for absolute executive immunity from court-ordered halts on federal property, actual demolition remains illegal under federal protections: (link #2)
National Park Service Management:
The Statue of Liberty National Monument (link #3) is federal property managed by the National Park Service.
Statutory Protections:
Demolishing a national monument requires rigorous environmental reviews, public consultation, and compliance with the National Historic Preservation Act.
The Role of Congress:
The DOJ explicitly noted in the same arguments that stopping such overreach or modifying such structures ultimately rests under the constitutional authority of Congress, not individual executive mandates.
Ultimately, the administration has expressed no real-world intention to destroy the monument. The scenario remains a purely theoretical legal example used by judges to test the outer boundaries of presidential power over federal property.
link #1
https://newrepublic.com/post/211422/department-justice-donald-trump-right-bulldoze-statue-liberty
link #2
https://www.politico.com/news/2026/06/05/white-house-ballroom-donald-trump-00951892
link #3
https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/307/
FakeNoose
(42,681 posts)orleans
(37,285 posts)"All of this further illustrates just how powerful the Trump administration believes itself to be: Its modus operandi is simply to break our nations laws with such speed that no one can stop it."
https://newrepublic.com/post/211422/department-justice-donald-trump-right-bulldoze-statue-liberty
mzmolly
(52,872 posts)metaphorically speaking.
Mr. Evil
(3,478 posts)They will be identified, completely doxxed and their house will be burned to the ground. And that will only be the beginning.
Tanuki
(16,547 posts)dickthegrouch
(4,704 posts)If he only has immunity for official acts: what constitutes an official act?
Make him personally liable for anything that doesn't match the definition precisely.
Personal liablity consequences are not to extend beyond the timeframe in which the original damage was done, without incurring additional penalties and jail time. I.e. If it took one day to destroy the east wing, damages payable in 24 hours after the court says "Not an official act". Damages MUST include restoration at his expense too.
This principle should be applicable to anything he damages in one way or another. Restitution due from personal funds immediately.
See my previous attempt at codification of official acts here: https://www.democraticunderground.com/100219319695
I think the Constitution (remember that?) has a list of acts the President is allowed to perform. Let's use that as our best basis for improvement. There's certain to be a raft of those coming in some administration very soon.
kentuck
(115,757 posts)Would someone send a strongly worded letter?