Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mainer

(12,629 posts)
Tue Jun 9, 2026, 01:42 PM 2 hrs ago

Even a WWII buff did NOT recognize it as a Totenkopf

Tesha first posted this link and it needs wider distribution.
This is why I don't believe those who claim they instantly recognized that tattoo as a Totenkopf.

I have made three films about the holocaust, looked at more than 5,000 still photographs of the Holocaust in the German national archive in Koblinz, spent two weeks in the photo archive at Yad Vashem in Israel looking at thousands of photographs, did a 90 minute PBS special about the French resistance against the Nazis, and I have an entire book about German military uniforms and I did not recognize his tattoo as an SS Totenkopf insignia when I first saw it. The actual Totenkopf insignias are small and silver, and when I saw the large black version on Platner’s chest I did not recognize it. I wish I had a dollar for every tattoo I ever saw that was a bad choice.


https://www.facebook.com/rob.gardner.399
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Even a WWII buff did NOT recognize it as a Totenkopf (Original Post) mainer 2 hrs ago OP
About Rob Gardner mainer 2 hrs ago #1
A person can just say they support Platner without having to prove how unobservant they are. WhiskeyGrinder 2 hrs ago #2
Yeah, the whole thing is a cheap smear -misanthroptimist 2 hrs ago #3
How embarrassing for him obamanut2012 2 hrs ago #4
At least the filmmaker is not denying what it is. sarisataka 1 hr ago #9
Perhaps he is not the WW2 buff you believe he is. sarisataka 2 hrs ago #5
World War II buff... BH liberal 2 hrs ago #6
It was OBVIOUSLY a totenkopf, but... Happy Hoosier 2 hrs ago #7
You found one. RandySF 2 hrs ago #8

WhiskeyGrinder

(27,315 posts)
2. A person can just say they support Platner without having to prove how unobservant they are.
Tue Jun 9, 2026, 01:54 PM
2 hrs ago

-misanthroptimist

(1,898 posts)
3. Yeah, the whole thing is a cheap smear
Tue Jun 9, 2026, 01:56 PM
2 hrs ago

And it didn't even work. I expect by November they'll trot out a parrot who says Platner wouldn't give him a cracker.

sarisataka

(22,953 posts)
9. At least the filmmaker is not denying what it is.
Tue Jun 9, 2026, 02:32 PM
1 hr ago

Just that he did not immediately recognize it outside of the context of a uniform.

Surprisingly, given his history of Holocaust documentaries but ir seems he did eventually see it.

sarisataka

(22,953 posts)
5. Perhaps he is not the WW2 buff you believe he is.
Tue Jun 9, 2026, 02:07 PM
2 hrs ago

I have noticed a trend of people who cannot believe others may have knowledge they are unaware of; why is it so difficult to accept? None of us are omniscient.

Happy Hoosier

(9,688 posts)
7. It was OBVIOUSLY a totenkopf, but...
Tue Jun 9, 2026, 02:11 PM
2 hrs ago

I don't necessarily expect Platner to have known that, and young men sometimes do stupid shit.

I'm not happy he got it, but I am willing to overlook it since he got it covered up.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Even a WWII buff did NOT ...