MIT study finds AI can already replace 11.7% of U.S. workforce
Source: CNBC
Tech
MIT study finds AI can already replace 11.7% of U.S. workforce
Published Wed, Nov 26 2025 10:00 AM EST Updated 13 Min Ago
MacKenzie Sigalos
@KENZIESIGALOS
Key Points
* Massachusetts Institute of Technology released a study that found that artificial intelligence can already replace 11.7% of the U.S. labor market.
* The study was conducted using a labor simulation tool called the Iceberg Index, which was created by MIT and Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
* For lawmakers preparing billion-dollar reskilling and training investments, the index offers a detailed map of where disruption is forming down to the zip code.
AI can already replace 11.7% of the U.S. workforce, MIT study finds
Massachusetts Institute of Technology on Wednesday released a study that found that artificial intelligence can already replace 11.7% of the U.S. labor market, or as much as $1.2 trillion in wages across finance, health care and professional services.
The study was conducted using a labor simulation tool called the Iceberg Index, which was created by MIT and Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The index simulates how 151 million U.S. workers interact across the country and how they are affected by AI and corresponding policy.
The Iceberg Index, which was announced earlier this year, offers a forward-looking view of how AI may reshape the labor market, not just in coastal tech hubs but across every state in the country. For lawmakers preparing billion-dollar reskilling and training investments, the index offers a detailed map of where disruption is forming down to the zip code.
Basically, we are creating a digital twin for the U.S. labor market, said Prasanna Balaprakash, ORNL director and co-leader of the research. ORNL is a Department of Energy research center in eastern Tennessee, home to the Frontier supercomputer, which powers many large-scale modeling efforts.
{snip}
Read more: https://www.cnbc.com/2025/11/26/mit-study-finds-ai-can-already-replace-11point7percent-of-us-workforce.html
groundloop
(13,505 posts)highplainsdem
(59,180 posts)is billion-dollar companies with no employees, just the owner/CEO.
FakeNoose
(39,694 posts)There are some jobs that will never be taken over by robots (AI) because it won't be cost effective. For example, fast food workers can rest easy because it's cheaper to pay humans minimum wages that to purchase robots to replace them. Also there are hazardous jobs that will continue being done by humans, such as plumbing, electrical, many outdoor jobs, as well as some law-enforcement and fire-fighting jobs but eventually those will be taken over by robots after the easier jobs have all been automated.
The trade-off will continue to be whether the owners decide to invest in more robots, or is it easier and cheaper to use humans for some jobs? The cost of robots will come down eventually, as more automated manufacturing makes it cheaper to build and program the robots. When robots build the robots, humans will still be the programmers and the quality-control testers, at least for a time.
I have a feeling that Sam Altman will be long dead, as we all will be, when the human race finally reaches that point.
bucolic_frolic
(53,475 posts)which is a rough estimate of salary plus SS payments by employer plus benefits.
My calculator won't even compute the number ... $1.43 x 10 to the twelfth. Spending will be contracting, which will shrink everything further, but TechBros will be rich!
Progressive dog
(7,554 posts)Somehow the industrial revolution and the technological revolution have not decreased the number of employees.
AI is so far little more than an expensive toy. It cannot create data, it can only use data created by humans.
FredGarvin
(731 posts)The interaction with humans is what makes the machines smarter.
These are not algorithms.
I use it constantly. Especially when addressing health, car troubles, savings, investments, taxes...etc.
Progressive dog
(7,554 posts)It only uses it. It can manipulate data it is given such as where you investments are, where to see what they are worth etc..
Blackjackdavey
(252 posts)And can say with certainty it is a) the ultimate echo chamber b) completely superficially handling any large data set. And by large I mean not very big at all. C) frequently inaccurate. D) Just repeats the same terms, phrases and sentence structure ad nauseum. And finally E) pretending to generate deep insights about anything but upon deeper scrutiny is simply reflecting what you already told it or obvious web searches, therefore, what you already know, back at you. Which of course leads to the ultimate confirmation bias.
gypsy11
(401 posts)You very eloquently stated what Im also finding.
ToxMarz
(2,647 posts)It can help speed developement time, but you can't do anything to complicated unless you already know what you are doing so you can even be able to ask the question correctly. You can't just say "create an website like amazon.com" and poof it's done. If already know what you're doing, it can spit out some pretty good solutions. For anything simulating human interaction, thought or opinion I don't have much use for it.
CentralMass
(16,795 posts)Haggard Celine
(17,596 posts)Look up.
CentralMass
(16,795 posts)Bayard
(28,013 posts)But, can it pick tomatoes?
OnlinePoker
(6,060 posts)Bayard
(28,013 posts)I don't see how they can replace a pair of human eyes when picking out bruised fruit.
OnlinePoker
(6,060 posts)As for bruised fruit, AI scans faces moving through crowded airports with pretty good accuracy. I imagine it will be able to quickly look at individual pieces of fruit and decide what's good and what's bad.
Silent Type
(12,188 posts)Think we'll adapt, even it it finally requires some form of Universal Basic Income.
CentralMass
(16,795 posts)LudwigPastorius
(13,884 posts)a lifetime of work (Social Security).
What makes you think they'll be amenable to paying people not to work?
Silent Type
(12,188 posts)good doomsday theory.
ret5hd
(22,049 posts)chowder66
(11,631 posts)BootinUp
(50,674 posts)purr-rat beauty
(882 posts)And AI goes zap!
LudwigPastorius
(13,884 posts)I'm sure those 19 million people can find challenging, good paying jobs with benefits elsewhere.


SamuelTheThird
(503 posts)Maybe it will thread the needle and manage both
OC375
(362 posts)I predict the RNC starts to support gun control as more and more bubbas lose their jobs, leaving them little but time and their guns to occupy them.
flvegan
(65,536 posts)If so, that headline could be hilarious.
MIT study, using AI, finds AI can already replace 11.7% of U.S. workforce
ProfessorGAC
(75,424 posts)...with 18.5 million people out of work?
This is moving into the realm of "just because we can do something doesn't mean we should".