Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SouthBayDem

(33,358 posts)
Tue May 19, 2026, 09:04 AM 10 hrs ago

Federal judge bans most arrests by federal agents in immigration courts in New York

Source: AP

NEW YORK (AP) — Federal agents can no longer make arrests without exceptional circumstances in and around three Manhattan buildings where immigration proceedings occur, a judge ruled Monday.

The decision by U.S. District Judge P. Kevin Castel brings an abrupt halt to a practice begun under the Trump administration that enabled agents to take into custody individuals who follow requirements to appear before immigration judges.

The arrests have resulted in dramatic scenes in courthouse hallways as those being detained were sometimes pulled away from emotional family members.

Castel said in a written decision that while there was “a strong governmental interest in enforcing immigration laws,” there also was a serious interest in letting individuals attend removal proceedings and pursue asylum claims before a judge “without fear of arrest.”

Read more: https://apnews.com/article/ice-immigration-courts-arrests-ruling-0d8fa782a85853f0092201069f4e21a8



Castel is a GW Bush nominee.
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Federal judge bans most arrests by federal agents in immigration courts in New York (Original Post) SouthBayDem 10 hrs ago OP
I am wondering why this was not done on day ONE?? riversedge 9 hrs ago #1
There had to be, unfortunatly, plantiffs to file against the apricothellbeast minions irisblue 8 hrs ago #2
RIGHT? Maybe "enough" evidence had to be collected before a federal judge could rule FOR due process. And what a ancianita 8 hrs ago #3

ancianita

(43,358 posts)
3. RIGHT? Maybe "enough" evidence had to be collected before a federal judge could rule FOR due process. And what a
Tue May 19, 2026, 11:11 AM
8 hrs ago

bad justice timeline of enforcement this really is. So bad that if Dems win back Congress, they have to reform the Third Branch to not just expand the SCOTUS, but put a timeline on federal judge decisions when court proceedings conclude by jury or final arguments.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Federal judge bans most a...