This was John Roberts' plan all along
This was John Roberts plan all along
The chief justice has declared that the Court is not political. The facts and his own history say otherwise
By David Daley
Contributing Writer
Published May 9, 2026 6:45AM (EDT)
(Salon) Maybe John Roberts is getting uneasy that the American people are onto him.
I think they view us as truly political actors, which I dont think is an accurate understanding of what we do, he told a conference of lawyers and judges in Pennsylvania. Were not simply part of the political process.
....(snip)....
This immediate erasure of Black political representation soon to become the largest since the death of Reconstruction was the predictable result of the Courts party-line decision last week in Callais v. Louisiana, the latest in a series of cases that eviscerated the Voting Rights Act. The decision will also create a massive reallocation of political power in the U.S. House, all of it headed away from Democrats and toward Republicans.
Roberts is a savvy political operator. He arrived at the Court from chief justice central casting, the Brooks Brothers-dad-next-door, and ever since his 2005 confirmation hearings, he has framed himself as a sensible midwestern institutionalist, an umpire calling balls and strikes. Roberts understood that it would be easier to enact his reactionary agenda if he could maintain the illusion that the Court functioned above the grubby influence of partisan politics.
....(snip)....
Just look at Shelby County v. Holder, the 2013 case that marked the Roberts Courts first shot at the VRA, which froze its most useful enforcement mechanism. Wealthy donors on the right, centered around a little known but staggeringly powerful organization called DonorsTrust often called the rights ATM helped fund, along with other major conservative foundations, the organization that developed the Shelby County case and identified the plaintiffs. Then they covered the seven-figure legal fees for the Supreme Court case. They also funded the Federalist Society, which helped vet the judges who decided it, and supported the conservative law professors who generated theories, legal concepts and amicus briefs. .....................(more)
https://www.salon.com/2026/05/09/this-was-john-roberts-plan-all-along/
Irish_Dem
(82,144 posts)erronis
(24,421 posts)It's not clear that he is beholden to foreign powers, but it also wouldn't surprise me.
CincyDem
(7,407 posts)mountain grammy
(29,164 posts)OGBuzz
(515 posts)He is a traitor to the Constitution and that is a crime. I'm sure there is bribery involved as well.
Billsdaughter
(175 posts)that let the Fox in the hen house:
Max Baucus (Montana)
Evan Bayh (Indiana)
Robert Byrd (West Virginia)
Thomas Carper (Delaware)
Kent Conrad (North Dakota)
Byron Dorgan (North Dakota)
Russ Feingold (Wisconsin)
Dianne Feinstein (California) - Note: While some sources list her as nay, the 2005 NYT and Senate record indicates she voted with the minority in some early procedures, but final vote was Yea.
Tim Johnson (South Dakota)
Herb Kohl (Wisconsin)
Mary Landrieu (Louisiana)
Patrick Leahy (Vermont)
Carl Levin (Michigan)
Joe Lieberman (Connecticut)Blanche Lincoln (Arkansas)
Bill Nelson (Florida)
Mark Pryor (Arkansas)
Jack Reed (Rhode Island)
Harry Reid (Nevada)
John Rockefeller (West Virginia)
Ken Salazar (Colorado)
Paul Sarbanes (Maryland)
Debbie Stabenow (Michigan)
Ron Wyden (Oregon)