Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

pat_k

(12,233 posts)
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 09:01 PM Sep 27

Halligan off to a brilliant start on Comey indictment [View all]

...

U.S. Magistrate Judge Lindsey Vaala expressed confusion and surprise at some points during the seven-minute court session...

"So this has never happened before. I've been handed two documents that are in the Mr. Comey case that are inconsistent with one another," Vaala said to Halligan. "There seems to be a discrepancy. They're both signed by the (grand jury) foreperson."

And she noted that one document did not clearly indicate what the grand jury had decided.

"The one that says it's a failure to concur in an indictment, it doesn't say with respect to one count," Vaala said. "It looks like they failed to concur across all three counts, so I'm a little confused as to why I was handed two things with the same case number that are inconsistent."

Halligan initially responded that she hadn't seen that version of the indictment.

"So I only reviewed the one with the two counts that our office redrafted when we found out about the two — two counts that were true billed, and I signed that one. I did not see the other one. I don't know where that came from," Halligan told the judge.

Vaala responded, "You didn't see it?" And Halligan again told her, "I did not see that one."

Vaala seemed surprised: "So your office didn't prepare the indictment that they —"

Halligan then replied, "No, no, no — I — no, I prepared three counts. I only signed the one — the two-count (indictment). I don't know which one with three counts you have in your hands."

"Okay. It has your signature on it," Vaala told Halligan, who responded, "Okay. Well."
..


Okay. Well. Indeed. Ms. Halligan, you are so f-ing far out of your depth it is staggering. Perhaps go back to being an insurance lawyer. You certainly have absolutely NO business attempting to prosecute a shoplifter, much less a former FBI director.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/judge-james-comey-indictment-confusion-trump/

And if you need a little detail on how baseless/incompetent/nonsensical the indictment is, there's a little background on it in this post::

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220678536#post1


32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Holy Shit! malaise Sep 27 #1
Correction pat_k Sep 27 #4
Thanks malaise Sep 27 #12
Are they really making up their own charges? Baitball Blogger Sep 27 #2
When did the grand jury convene to bring these charges? This happened so quickly Deuxcents Sep 27 #5
Or are they using the results of a grand jury that concluded just the opposite of what they're doing? Baitball Blogger Sep 27 #7
These charges came within days of statute of limitations, got a grand jury together to charge 2 counts Deuxcents Sep 27 #8
The bogus case wouldn't.take long to present pat_k Sep 27 #10
I don't know. pat_k Sep 27 #9
Supposedly not about McCabe, about Richman Justice Sep 28 #28
Oh man! How many dots that don't connect did they... pat_k Sep 28 #30
I wonder if the grand jury "No billed" and they wrote up a "True bill" anyway. 3Hotdogs Sep 27 #21
MAGA incompetency might be the one thing that saves us from the voter incompetency that elected these dipshits. W_HAMILTON Sep 27 #3
Yes. And the level of incompetence is staggering. pat_k Sep 27 #6
Thanks malaise Sep 27 #11
Remember, she will be handling cases against real criminals too. Sneederbunk Sep 27 #13
Already, the entire 47 DOJ has lost all credibility with judges ... pat_k Sep 27 #18
As I said before, I smell a rat and the judge should moniss Sep 27 #14
My thoughts in this previous post: pat_k Sep 28 #27
Was it just a way to get the original charges Buddyzbuddy Sep 27 #15
My thought in this previous post: pat_k Sep 28 #26
I Don't Get It DET Sep 27 #16
That's how I read it too--but the story is confusing. Nt spooky3 Sep 27 #23
I don't read fabrication into it pat_k Sep 28 #25
I don't read "fabrication" into it. pat_k Sep 27 #24
Thank You! DET Sep 28 #29
So, this is the government we deserve? SleeplessinSoCal Sep 27 #17
Dumber than rocks. Joinfortmill Sep 27 #19
" I didn't know we had to tell Your Honor one single consistent story: struggle4progress Sep 27 #20
It's a rickety bridge no one in their right mind would try to cross pat_k Sep 28 #31
Looks as if lawyering was not her entry in the Miss Colorado talent competition. Nt spooky3 Sep 27 #22
James Comey could get Trump's prosecutor outright disqualified from office: expert LetMyPeopleVote Oct 2 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Halligan off to a brillia...