Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DET

(2,288 posts)
16. I Don't Get It
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 10:48 PM
Sep 27

Does this mean that the judge has a document that implies that the jury did not indict on ANY of the counts, and a conflicting document that says that they agreed to indict on two counts? Are they on the same date and time? How is this possible? Maybe I’m reading too much into this, but this would seem to imply that Halligan fabricated one of these documents, presumably the one that shows two indictments by the grand jury. If so, that would have huge repercussions. Damn, this gets confusing.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Holy Shit! malaise Sep 27 #1
Correction pat_k Sep 27 #4
Thanks malaise Sep 27 #12
Are they really making up their own charges? Baitball Blogger Sep 27 #2
When did the grand jury convene to bring these charges? This happened so quickly Deuxcents Sep 27 #5
Or are they using the results of a grand jury that concluded just the opposite of what they're doing? Baitball Blogger Sep 27 #7
These charges came within days of statute of limitations, got a grand jury together to charge 2 counts Deuxcents Sep 27 #8
The bogus case wouldn't.take long to present pat_k Sep 27 #10
I don't know. pat_k Sep 27 #9
Supposedly not about McCabe, about Richman Justice Sep 28 #28
Oh man! How many dots that don't connect did they... pat_k Sep 28 #30
I wonder if the grand jury "No billed" and they wrote up a "True bill" anyway. 3Hotdogs Sep 27 #21
MAGA incompetency might be the one thing that saves us from the voter incompetency that elected these dipshits. W_HAMILTON Sep 27 #3
Yes. And the level of incompetence is staggering. pat_k Sep 27 #6
Thanks malaise Sep 27 #11
Remember, she will be handling cases against real criminals too. Sneederbunk Sep 27 #13
Already, the entire 47 DOJ has lost all credibility with judges ... pat_k Sep 27 #18
As I said before, I smell a rat and the judge should moniss Sep 27 #14
My thoughts in this previous post: pat_k Sep 28 #27
Was it just a way to get the original charges Buddyzbuddy Sep 27 #15
My thought in this previous post: pat_k Sep 28 #26
I Don't Get It DET Sep 27 #16
That's how I read it too--but the story is confusing. Nt spooky3 Sep 27 #23
I don't read fabrication into it pat_k Sep 28 #25
I don't read "fabrication" into it. pat_k Sep 27 #24
Thank You! DET Sep 28 #29
So, this is the government we deserve? SleeplessinSoCal Sep 27 #17
Dumber than rocks. Joinfortmill Sep 27 #19
" I didn't know we had to tell Your Honor one single consistent story: struggle4progress Sep 27 #20
It's a rickety bridge no one in their right mind would try to cross pat_k Sep 28 #31
Looks as if lawyering was not her entry in the Miss Colorado talent competition. Nt spooky3 Sep 27 #22
James Comey could get Trump's prosecutor outright disqualified from office: expert LetMyPeopleVote Oct 2 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Halligan off to a brillia...»Reply #16