Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

LyfeTimeDem

(252 posts)
Tue Oct 7, 2025, 07:26 PM Tuesday

Democratic Socialism [View all]

"I think we just need to realize that the end goal is, ultimately, like social control of the means of production," said Joe Cernelli, a founding member of that West Virginia DSA chapter. "You know we don't just want to improve capitalism, we will ultimately want to get rid of it."

That's not just his idea; the DSA **views capitalism as an oppressive system** — "We see it as fundamentally undemocratic," as DSA National Director Maria Svart put it. Here's how she sums up what the group wants:
"When it comes right down to it, we believe people need to be able to live a dignified life. I mean, there are certain things that should not be left up to the market," she said.

Removing some parts of the economy from the forces of the free market, for example. In other words, socialism.

But beyond that, the group advocates for some pretty revolutionary changes to democracy, like abolishing the Senate. The DSA calls it "extremely unrepresentative" for the way it gives both tiny and huge states alike two senators each — the group would like to replace it with a more representative body.

The country — and the attitudes of most American voters — are pretty far from this vision, though, so the DSA is willing to pursue policies that fall short of its ultimate goals. Health care is one example — the group backs "Medicare for All" — where the government provides health insurance, but the private sector supplies the doctors and hospitals. But many DSA members would prefer a system where the government employs the doctors themselves. (aka gaslighting them)

"I think we could do better than Bernie, but I think it was definitely a good start," he said. "There are some policies that I think he's been a little too soft on, a little too Democrat for me."


And likewise, Svart says, the group sees Sanders as an "ally" while also wanting to go further than he does on many areas. (aka too far left for even Bernie Sanders. .WOW)


https://www.npr.org/2018/07/26/630960719/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-democratic-socialists-of-america

And another very good article from the Nation that I think should be examined not dismissed:

Why I Just Quit DSA
After over four decades as a member of the Democratic Socialists of America, one of the group’s founding members is leaving in sorrow and anger.

All well and good—except for the return of the entryists. Suddenly, in the eyes of revolutionary purists in a host of small competing sects, DSA was no longer to be sneered at as just a reformist swamp. “Why rob banks?” career criminal Willie Sutton was once allegedly asked by a reporter. “Because that’s where the money is,” he replied. The exchange is apocryphal, but substitute warm bodies for cold cash, and it offers a concise explanation for DSA’s sudden attractiveness to sectarian strategists. Unknown numbers—hundreds, perhaps more—started joining in 2016, some of them former members of defunct Marxist-Leninist groups, others (in violation of DSA bylaws) still belonging to and carrying out the agendas of such groups. They proceeded to quarrel and compete among themselves, splitting and recombining under various banners like “Red Star,” “Marxist Unity Group,” and even the “Communist Caucus.” But they remained united in one overarching shared aim—to take a well-meaning, not particularly well-organized, and essentially social democratic organization still committed in practice to the original DSA vision of creating “the left wing of the possible,” and reinvent it as the mass vanguard party of the proletariat that somehow they had never been able to pull off while operating under their own banners of deepest red.

DSA, meanwhile, thrived between 2016 and 2020—because it proved it could win victories in the here-and-now, give-and-take world of electoral politics. And that, ironically, was intolerable to the entryists (who preferred to refer to themselves as “partyists”), because they didn’t want socialists to remain as a wing of, or even a loyal opposition within the Democratic Party. They wanted a break, in the not terribly distant future, from the intolerable compromises required to appeal to mainstream voters and to compromise with mainstream politicians. And they also believed that DSA members elected to public office were, first and foremost, obliged to follow the positions adopted by the organization, rather than their constituents or their own conscience, as if they were already subordinate to the dictates of an old-fashioned Marxist-Leninist central committee.

https://www.thenation.com/article/activism/quit-dsa-gaza-israel/

And this too



OPEN LETTER
Out of Loyalty to Democratic Socialism: Why We Are Leaving DSA


Twenty-four longtime members of the Democratic Socialists of America explain why they’re leaving the organization.

https://newrepublic.com/article/176781/open-letter-why-leaving-democratic-socialists-america


I'm quite happy to stay a Social Democrat myself....My political hero is FDR, so I support Regulated Capitalism ...I don't want it eliminated.

56 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Democratic Socialism [View all] LyfeTimeDem Tuesday OP
if ya can't succeed with your own beliefs, sink your claws into an available other..... nt msongs Tuesday #1
So is mine. OldBaldy1701E Tuesday #2
well I see no evidence that LyfeTimeDem Tuesday #3
Question... when was capitalism successfully regulated? (n/t) OldBaldy1701E Tuesday #5
Capitalism is currently pretty well regulated in the Scandinavian countries Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #9
Since I do not know the workings of European commerce, I will take your word on their successes. OldBaldy1701E Wednesday #45
In Scandinavian countries, people come before profits. Fiendish Thingy Wednesday #47
for 50 yrs in the U.S. LyfeTimeDem Tuesday #11
I don't know that one. OldBaldy1701E Wednesday #46
EXACTLY my point! LyfeTimeDem Wednesday #48
Capitalism is successful in generating wealth for the few iemanja Tuesday #8
Sounds like what happens in the Socialist LyfeTimeDem Tuesday #12
I suggest you read Marx iemanja Tuesday #13
what makes you think I don't know LyfeTimeDem Tuesday #14
Your post gave me that impression iemanja Tuesday #15
then you are not reading my posts LyfeTimeDem Tuesday #16
Dont need to LyfeTimeDem Tuesday #18
Most folks don't know the difference between Social Democracy and Democratic Socialism Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #4
nope I do not LyfeTimeDem Tuesday #6
Thom Hartmann is a member of Democratic Underground. Emile Wednesday #44
and? LyfeTimeDem Wednesday #49
I'm not sure you know the meaning of "gaslighting" muriel_volestrangler Wednesday #54
If the philosophy can't be digested to a sentence mr715 Tuesday #35
Sounds like you're a libertarian. Nt Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #36
Ew mr715 Tuesday #37
Neoliberalism is a failed economic ideology Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #38
Maybe I'm mislabeling myself mr715 Wednesday #52
Democrats aren't neoliberals, it's a Both Sides insult, "an attempt to win an argument with an epithet." betsuni Wednesday #43
is it a "mess"? LyfeTimeDem Wednesday #50
And yet democracies can fall prey to demagogues mr715 Wednesday #51
Adam Smith the father of market capitalism in his book multigraincracker Tuesday #7
regulated.. but not eliminated... LyfeTimeDem Tuesday #19
According to Multigrain Economics. multigraincracker Tuesday #25
where??? LyfeTimeDem Tuesday #26
Quiet a few. multigraincracker Tuesday #27
so A* business is the proof? LyfeTimeDem Tuesday #32
Even a list of the top 100 worker owned businesses. multigraincracker Tuesday #28
which is where? LyfeTimeDem Tuesday #33
Yeah, I don't like DSA is Cha Tuesday #10
Very welcome LyfeTimeDem Tuesday #17
As Cha said, thanks for your OP, LyfeTimeDem Hekate Tuesday #20
and its straight up LyfeTimeDem Tuesday #22
Well, tread lightly. Feelings are high these days. Hekate Tuesday #30
obviously, my own feelings are high. LyfeTimeDem Tuesday #34
Well, capitalism IS an oppressive system thought crime Tuesday #21
it IS to most Democrats LyfeTimeDem Tuesday #23
If you are a Social Democrat then you, too, want to temper Capitalism's oppression thought crime Wednesday #56
This message was self-deleted by its author LyfeTimeDem Tuesday #24
Is DSA taking over the Democratic Party? leftstreet Tuesday #29
according to one of its LyfeTimeDem Tuesday #31
I see people describing it as economic equality, no understanding of regulated or unregulated capitalism. betsuni Wednesday #39
What is he talking about about? LyfeTimeDem Wednesday #40
That's what I said. betsuni Wednesday #41
Bernie Sanders doesn't get to make a LyfeTimeDem Wednesday #42
Yes, that's the plan! The base of the party knows it's ridiculous, why the base is redefined betsuni Wednesday #53
Mamdani is going to be a great NY City Mayor! Emile Wednesday #55
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Democratic Socialism