Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Layzeebeaver

(2,092 posts)
2. actually, its not slop. I played a core part in framing and editing of this.
Sat Oct 11, 2025, 05:38 AM
Yesterday

It's a tool. I used it. I explained that it was AI in practice.

I'm not trying to pass it off as human only.

Your "de-rec" is disingenuous, but also nothing personal.

Recommendations

9 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

de rec (for posting nothing but AI slop) Celerity Yesterday #1
actually, its not slop. I played a core part in framing and editing of this. Layzeebeaver Yesterday #2
Non sequitur. I never it was an attempt at passing it off as human made. Celerity Yesterday #6
That sounds human supremacist! Polybius 5 hrs ago #57
Your use of ChatGPT is unethical, if you're aware of the many news stories and the many posts here highplainsdem Yesterday #7
and if I did this on my own? Layzeebeaver Yesterday #9
Yes. Of course. It would be your own work. The difference is obvious. Just as there's an obvious highplainsdem Yesterday #11
So... a PHD dude in 1970 has 12 understudies... Layzeebeaver Yesterday #18
Please look up the meaning of "understudy" because you obviously don't know it. highplainsdem Yesterday #49
Yes. WhiskeyGrinder Yesterday #14
That is much too extreme a view. yardwork Yesterday #25
No, it isn't. If you're using AI without being forced to do so by your job or school, and you're aware highplainsdem Yesterday #43
Take a breath.............. Jack Valentino 18 hrs ago #53
Jeez. I actually DON'T use AI to write or create anything. yardwork 7 hrs ago #55
If you'd talked to the near-suicidal artists, writers and teachers (who see their students being dumbed down) highplainsdem 6 hrs ago #56
How was Celerity disingenuous? obamanut2012 Yesterday #32
That was interesting. 2naSalit Yesterday #3
Write it yourself. Don't use an unethical tool trained on stolen intellectual property. highplainsdem Yesterday #8
And write it in longhand with a quill pen and homemade ink. yardwork Yesterday #27
Stop being so silly. No one suggested that. I love tech that actually helps, and I had an HP laser printer highplainsdem Yesterday #44
One of my concerns... 2naSalit Yesterday #35
You don't want it stealing YOUR stuff, but you're fine with it being trained on all the writing by other people highplainsdem Yesterday #45
Whoa there... 2naSalit 23 hrs ago #50
I don't use AI, but I've been doing this for years (just for fun). Latest example: DFW Yesterday #4
pretty cool... Layzeebeaver Yesterday #5
That's GREAT! Thanks for sharing. I enjoyed reading and humming-along. QueerDuck Yesterday #10
AI is the machine gun in WW1 part 3 Layzeebeaver Yesterday #12
There's nothing creative about shooting a gun. Tommy Carcetti Yesterday #33
Exactly. And there's nothing creative about having genAI do something for you. highplainsdem Yesterday #47
The people who'll be hurt by AI tools that dumb them down are not the ones refusing to participate highplainsdem Yesterday #46
Boring and vague. Not a fan of the original, but at least the wordplay and references in it mean something. WhiskeyGrinder Yesterday #13
A fair opinion Layzeebeaver Yesterday #15
"wrecks the environment"????? Layzeebeaver Yesterday #16
Damage to the envirinment is just one of a number of harms from genAI and the data centers being highplainsdem Yesterday #17
This is a deep subject Layzeebeaver Yesterday #20
There's no way to use genAI built on theft ethically. That's like saying you'll use slave labor ethically. highplainsdem Yesterday #22
did you actually read what I wrote? Layzeebeaver Yesterday #23
Yes. Which is why you got that response. You wrote: highplainsdem Yesterday #41
A guy from my office showed me what one of those programs could do DFW Yesterday #31
We can try to prevent worse from happening, or we can let it happen by saying "we've already come so far, why not WhiskeyGrinder Yesterday #19
I'm not fighting for anything here... Layzeebeaver Yesterday #21
Fighting for open-mindedness? About something that reduces creativity, reduces brain activity, plagiarizes art WhiskeyGrinder Yesterday #24
What? Layzeebeaver Yesterday #28
. WhiskeyGrinder Yesterday #34
Thank you for catching this and calling it out. ms liberty Yesterday #36
user name checks out eShirl Yesterday #26
Quite a poignant poem WestMichRad Yesterday #29
yea... unfortunate Layzeebeaver Yesterday #30
Weird Al Yankovich never had to use AI. ms liberty Yesterday #37
same applies to spell check... Layzeebeaver Yesterday #39
An inspiration by itself isn't music, or a book, or a painting. Just having an idea does not entitle you highplainsdem Yesterday #48
I'm not pretending Layzeebeaver 4 hrs ago #58
Ethics is not a separate topic. It's inherent when this tech exists only because of stolen IP. The fact highplainsdem 4 hrs ago #59
What exactly is "American Pie" anyhow? nt Disaffected Yesterday #38
"American Pie" was a silly jingle GenThePerservering Yesterday #40
Way too much Democratic whining over this worthy portrayal of current events. (nt) Paladin Yesterday #42
A Prius? How American. n/t flvegan 23 hrs ago #51
Exactly! Layzeebeaver 18 hrs ago #52
That is excellent! Thanks! Owl 17 hrs ago #54
considering the environmental and ethical issues involving this kind of slop Blue_Adept 4 hrs ago #60
"AI is a Ponzi scheme designed to harvest large investments....a way to destroy IP for the individual and vest it to the highplainsdem 3 hrs ago #61
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I asked ChatGPT to rewrit...»Reply #2