Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

spooky3

(38,524 posts)

4. A lot of us have concerns about that term.

Reply to MarineCombatEngineer (Reply #2)

Tue Jan 13, 2026, 09:58 PM

Jan 13

What does it mean? If it means to take away someone’s right to behave in a toxic or violent way, or to stop him from asserting dominance over someone wrongfully, that’s not a masculine characteristic—it’s an antisocial characteristic, and taking it away seems good.

And why is there no parallel term for women? Has anyone ever been “efeminated”? What would that mean?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

MarineCombatEngineer

22 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Don't Defund ICE [View all] angrychair Jan 13 OP

I prefer "Defenestrate ICE" myself... regnaD kciN Jan 13 #1

I agree, MarineCombatEngineer Jan 13 #2

A lot of us have concerns about that term. spooky3 Jan 13 #4

It's already emasculated. stage left Jan 14 #9

The smart people in Portland have said this for years. Klarkashton Jan 13 #3

DURec leftstreet Jan 13 #5

Seconded... ABOLISH IT! (n/t) OldBaldy1701E Jan 13 #7

I prefer SEND ICE TO HELL. usonian Jan 13 #6

Have to get rid of the christofascist regime first. Otherwise... Thomas Hurt Jan 13 #8

Reframe Everything they say stillspkg Jan 14 #10

Defund meaning anything other than take their all money away Ms. Toad Jan 14 #11

Ummm, "Crack the Ice" Intractable Jan 14 #12

So who would handle enforcing immigration laws? n/t Wanderlust988 Jan 14 #13

Who handled them before ICE was established in 2003? WhiskeyGrinder Jan 14 #15

INS which also was law enforcement too. n/t Wanderlust988 Jan 14 #16

don't I know it WhiskeyGrinder Jan 14 #17

Any specific practical solutions/alternatives you propose? Torchlight Jan 14 #21

Nobody in the interim angrychair Jan 14 #18

That's ludicrous that no one is there to enforce immigration laws. It's not feasible and very stupid. Wanderlust988 Jan 14 #19

a kinder, gentler deportation process, perhaps? WhiskeyGrinder Jan 14 #20

We also bear some responsibility as GW Bush wanted to work with Dems on reform Wanderlust988 Jan 14 #22

. WhiskeyGrinder Jan 14 #14