Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Where are the Genocide Joe protest voters? [View all]Celerity
(54,089 posts)70. Biden plans to send $8bn arms shipment to Israel - 4 January 2025

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cpvne94v1rdo
The US Department of State has notified Congress of a planned $8bn (£6.4bn) arms sale to Israel, an American official has confirmed to the BBC. The weapons consignment, which needs approval from House and Senate committees, includes missiles, shells and other munitions.
The move comes just over a fortnight before President Joe Biden leaves office.
Washington has rejected calls to suspend military backing for Israel because of the number of civilians killed during the war in Gaza.
In August, the US approved the sale of $20bn in fighter jets and other military equipment to Israel. The latest planned shipment contains air-to-air missiles, Hellfire missiles, artillery shells and bombs, the US official said.
snip
https://www.cfr.org/articles/us-aid-israel-four-charts

snip
Are there any conditions or restrictions attached to the aid?
Transfers of U.S. military equipment to Israel, as to other foreign governments, are subject to relevant U.S. and international law. The president must notify Congress [PDF] before selling foreign powers major weapon systems or services valued above a certain dollar threshold, and lawmakers are allowed a period to review the sale. For transactions with Israel (and other close U.S. allies), the threshold that triggers a fifteen-day congressional review ranges from $25 million to $300 million, depending on the defense articles or services.
Congress can block a sale through a joint resolution, although this has never happened. In special cases, the president can bypass congressional review if they deem that a national security emergency exists. President Biden used this expedited waiver process for both Israel and Ukraine, and President Trump used it for Saudi Arabia in his first term and Israel in his second. For smaller transactions that dont meet the dollar threshold, no congressional review is required.
The United States cannot provide security assistance to foreign governments or groups that commit gross human rights violations, a red line enshrined in the so-called Leahy Law. Some legal scholars and other critics have alleged that the United States has not applied the Leahy Law with regard to Israel as it has with other Middle Eastern countries.
Any military aid that the United States provides to recipients must only be used according to agreed-upon terms and conditions, and it is incumbent on the U.S. government to monitor the end use of the equipment it provides. For instance, the Ronald Reagan administration banned transfers of cluster munitions to Israel for several years in the 1980s after it determined that Israel had used them on civilian targets during its invasion of Lebanon.
snip

snip
Are there any conditions or restrictions attached to the aid?
Transfers of U.S. military equipment to Israel, as to other foreign governments, are subject to relevant U.S. and international law. The president must notify Congress [PDF] before selling foreign powers major weapon systems or services valued above a certain dollar threshold, and lawmakers are allowed a period to review the sale. For transactions with Israel (and other close U.S. allies), the threshold that triggers a fifteen-day congressional review ranges from $25 million to $300 million, depending on the defense articles or services.
Congress can block a sale through a joint resolution, although this has never happened. In special cases, the president can bypass congressional review if they deem that a national security emergency exists. President Biden used this expedited waiver process for both Israel and Ukraine, and President Trump used it for Saudi Arabia in his first term and Israel in his second. For smaller transactions that dont meet the dollar threshold, no congressional review is required.
The United States cannot provide security assistance to foreign governments or groups that commit gross human rights violations, a red line enshrined in the so-called Leahy Law. Some legal scholars and other critics have alleged that the United States has not applied the Leahy Law with regard to Israel as it has with other Middle Eastern countries.
Any military aid that the United States provides to recipients must only be used according to agreed-upon terms and conditions, and it is incumbent on the U.S. government to monitor the end use of the equipment it provides. For instance, the Ronald Reagan administration banned transfers of cluster munitions to Israel for several years in the 1980s after it determined that Israel had used them on civilian targets during its invasion of Lebanon.
snip
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
5 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
128 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yes there were, long long threads of them. Experts like Malcolm Nance ignored.
betsuni
Yesterday
#38
I was at her book event in Richmond on Feb 2nd and two of those idiots showed up...
PunkinPi
Yesterday
#16
Hamas as freedom fighters: "One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. Ask Nelson Mandela."
betsuni
Yesterday
#15
Biden isn't the president anymore. But in my neck of the woods, a lot of the same people are protesting military actions
WhiskeyGrinder
Yesterday
#20
That Democrats are corrupt, rig primaries, bribed and controlled by AIPAC is a constant conspiracy theory.
betsuni
Yesterday
#45
The PRESIDENT has to sign those aid bills, he absolutely DID have a say in it....
Jack Valentino
16 hrs ago
#102
And I NEVER approved of those words being used about President Biden or VP Harris---
Jack Valentino
15 hrs ago
#108
There are no "Genocide Joe protest voters" here. So no one will be "taking a bow". Glad to clear that up.
AloeVera
20 hrs ago
#81
The obvious solution would have been to listen to the base - opposed to the Gaza policy by 80%
AloeVera
21 hrs ago
#75
And the death and destruction only got worse, accelerated, and expanded over the past year.
W_HAMILTON
23 hrs ago
#61
And once again she obvously meant per year. Interesting how you can not see that.
Eko
7 hrs ago
#121
When you refuse to choose between """the lesser of two evils,""" you get the greater evil.
W_HAMILTON
23 hrs ago
#58
I really doubt there's a possibility of an alliance with those jackasses.
NoMoreRepugs
23 hrs ago
#64
It doesn't have to go away, but voters, whether they be progressive or moderate Dems as
walkingman
20 hrs ago
#82
Those people want Republicans in Office. Even now they are tryng to blame democrsts for Trump getting into Iran war
JI7
23 hrs ago
#62
I don't think it's unreasonable to ask a candidate to condemn genocide.
BlueTsunami2018
21 hrs ago
#76
"Bones and scraps thrown your way?" You mean like the Affordable Care Act or expanded Medicare or...
PeaceWave
21 hrs ago
#78
"'What is it about sixty votes these people don't understand?' I groused to my staff.
betsuni
13 hrs ago
#117
Ah well I'm sure Harris being less friendly would have made a huge difference. Less Friendly lol.
Eko
16 hrs ago
#99
I think it's time to refresh some memories of what Vice President Kamala Harris said about Gaza
Quiet Em
21 hrs ago
#80
Thank you. It's like the last thing the Killer Kamala Krowd would ever think of would be to actually listen to her.
betsuni
17 hrs ago
#92
I am honestly stunned there are "Democrats" who think Democratic candidates
MorbidButterflyTat
15 hrs ago
#106
Plenty of excuse-making, though. The lack of outrage is directly proportional the the casualties.
QueerDuck
19 hrs ago
#89
I see people saying they object to the US assisting with the destruction of Gaza. I see people saying
Scrivener7
6 hrs ago
#123