Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

in2herbs

(4,371 posts)

1. I was following the MT attempt but quit after a court ruled that it discriminated against

Reply to applegrove (Original post)

Mon Mar 2, 2026, 07:26 PM

Monday

corporations' rights, since corporations are people, too!

Can't remember whether it was MT Supreme Court, a Circuit Court, or the USSC or what the status of the MT attempt is at the present time.

But I am wholly in favor of the idea!!!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How California can neuter "Citizens United". [View all] applegrove Monday OP

I was following the MT attempt but quit after a court ruled that it discriminated against in2herbs Monday #1

I've been thinking about this since I first heard about the Montana corporate definitions. pecosbob Monday #2

I can't prove you wrong Fiendish Thingy Monday #3

Citizens United is a 501(c ) ( 4) non-profit corporation. So is MoveOn.org. onenote Monday #4

Some have hope. I doubt the corporations or moveon would be unable to do business applegrove Monday #5

What would MoveOn do in California? onenote 23 hrs ago #6

Yikes! applegrove 19 hrs ago #7