Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(683 posts)

3. Will

Tue Mar 3, 2026, 12:41 PM

Yesterday

Not technically difficult after the material procurement phase. Lots have already crossed that hurdle. It's mainly the will to do it after that.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Iran and dirty bombs [View all] JBTaurus83 Yesterday OP

Absolutely Greg_In_SF Yesterday #1

Well JBTaurus83 Yesterday #2

Enriched uranium and uranium as a whole is actually a poor material for that use DetroitLegalBeagle Yesterday #4

Exactly. They probably have amounts of Cs137 or other isotopes Jerry2144 Yesterday #6

The point of a dirty bomb would not be its effectiveness sarisataka Yesterday #12

Also true DetroitLegalBeagle Yesterday #15

Will OC375 Yesterday #3

Easily.... Boo1 Yesterday #5

Im shocked they havent used it Johonny Yesterday #7

A dirty bomb is meant to contaminate a large area for generations. Swede Yesterday #11

There would be no EMP sarisataka Yesterday #16

Chemical and biological JBTaurus83 Yesterday #9

They can but then it gives their adversaries a excuse to go nuclear EX500rider Yesterday #10

To make one- absolutely sarisataka Yesterday #13

Chemical and biological too. C_U_L8R Yesterday #14

Why would they want or need to do that? David__77 Yesterday #19