Scoop: Jeffries faces growing threat of 2027 rebellion

[bigtree]

75. next one has the same problem

...they will be representing the same group of Democrats who elected Jeffries.

Funny how Democrats are killing it in polling, and Jeffries has presided over near unanimous votes, which is what his actual job is; but we still get this clawing bullshit blaming our leaders for what republicans control.

WE don't vote the leaders in, the elected Dems do that. Moreover, most of these efforts from these internet or media sources are directed at removing them from their seats, which is absurd considering they vote as solidly progressive or more, than their collective membership.

I'm always bemused by how many people jump into these threads to essentially say they need someone to perform and buck THEM up to vote for Democrats. It's pathetic.

These Democrats ALWAYS produce historic progressive legislative change in the majority. This bullshit is a cheap shot at them for not having the majority WE neglected to provide them.

Such a specious, uninformed, counterproductive, navelgazing, backbiting effort. Should work out as well as trashing the incumbent president at the encouragement of many of these same people right before we voted did the last major election.

The only saving grace is that most sane people are focused on getting a majority back. It people who have nothing to lose who gamble away what they already possess.

...btw, this is pure horseshit.

"The Democratic Party and its leadership—Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries—have failed to mobilize meaningful opposition to Trump's illegal war and their silence as AIPAC and corporations flood Congressional primaries with millions of dollars is deafening."

There is overwhelming opposition in the country to all of these so what's that actual fuck with claiming there isn't?