Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(94,294 posts)
24. I'll bet they don't have the votes
Sun Mar 22, 2026, 12:07 AM
Mar 22

....people pushing this are going to find out that the problem isn't Schumer, if there is actually a problem with the vast majority of Americans rejecting republicans on every level.

They're going to begin to realize that not only is Schumer a dependable individual vote, he didn't nominate and elect himself leader - and that his role isn't so much to perform for his critics, but to organize and represent the consensus of a diverse membership into unified votes.

None of the people balking from the left, for instance, are likely to be able to gain the confidence of a membership rife with moderates; not even to gain enough of their votes to obtain the leadership, much less coalesce on legislation.

They will just vote in another moderate. We don't make that choice, they do.

People just yell at Schumer and Jeffries because they can't countenance confronting the people who put them in those positions of leadership.

It's a feint, really, pretending there's some different formula that can be achieved by reshuffling the same deck of cards; absurdly, in the middle of the game.

It's ignorance or foolishness or both; but it's a certainty that it's sophistry pretending Schumer is to blame for what the membership or republicans have done, ir that some new leader is going to do more than perform differently, with exactly the same results Schumer would have achieved, and more than likely producijng an inexperienced, unconnected less that the experienced connected pol has done since he presided over ALL Biden's historic legislative accomplishments in the majority.

Remember those? It's as if people can't bring themselves to even mention those accomplishments he presided over in the Senate, fought for and achieved with two turncoats in a slim majority, and it's a weird as hell omission; likely self-serving to this stupidity.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I wonder why they'd leak this leftstreet Mar 21 #1
Indeed... Bread and Circuses Mar 21 #3
What was that? senseandsensibility Mar 22 #40
A few D legislatures don't want him to lead. A lot of dissatisfaction Bread and Circuses Mar 22 #45
probably a trial balloon to see how the reaction is? themaguffin Mar 22 #25
Don't wait until the midterms. yellow dahlia Mar 21 #2
Interesting... some of these senate races have become proxy wars fujiyamasan Mar 21 #4
old enough to remember when the conservative 'blue dogs' did this to Pelosi bigtree Mar 21 #5
Sure. Because Liz Warren, Chris Murphy and Tina Smith are all about that "playschool steering wheel." Scrivener7 Mar 21 #19
I have zero interest in personality politics. I want winners. That is all. usonian Mar 21 #6
winners Skittles Mar 21 #7
We don't need infighting at this time. C Moon Mar 21 #8
We've seen that many times before Orrex Mar 22 #35
Careful there! Tellng the truth will get you reported for "bashing" 3_Limes Mar 22 #37
We also don't need J-9 Mar 22 #52
If these were normal times, Schumer would be fine as Democratic leader in the Senate. But we do not live in such times, Fil1957 Mar 21 #9
So who is your choice? wnylib Mar 21 #10
Chris Murphy. Scrivener7 Mar 21 #16
I haven't thought about it much, but Ossoff, Slotkin, Kelly, Warren, Gallego, Sanders would all be a significant Fil1957 Mar 21 #21
Elizabeth Warren, Corey Booker or Bernie Sanders pinkstarburst Mar 22 #38
Let's say that ANY of those choices were leader Boo1 Mar 22 #50
that guy will never give up power Skittles Mar 21 #12
My thoughts exactly LostOne4Ever Mar 21 #13
There was never a time that he was a strong leader. Intractable Mar 21 #15
He had Nancy to run interference. She was often the one talking, he the one nodding next to her. Scrivener7 Mar 21 #17
"It's not just that you give us something to vote AGAINST, but something to vote FOR!" W_HAMILTON Mar 21 #11
Chris Murphy would be excellent. You talk as if we have no bench. We have an awesome bench. We need to let them play. Scrivener7 Mar 21 #18
Did he throw his name in the hat? W_HAMILTON Mar 22 #43
So you do agree that Schumer has been tepid at best. Good to know. Scrivener7 Mar 22 #44
You mean there's an actual process MorbidButterflyTat Mar 22 #49
He's a huge liability. BlueNProud Mar 21 #14
Show me the votes newdeal2 Mar 21 #20
please... mike_c Mar 21 #22
It's time. Joinfortmill Mar 21 #23
I'll bet they don't have the votes bigtree Mar 22 #24
Bingo DaBronx Mar 22 #30
I think you're responding to the wrong person. Joinfortmill Mar 22 #33
I don't think it helps Democrats bucolic_frolic Mar 22 #26
Schumer and Jeffries are NOT up to the moment we face boston bean Mar 22 #27
Yeah but don't say that too loud luv2fly Mar 22 #29
Toe the party line GenThePerservering Mar 22 #39
I thought it was tow too? boston bean Mar 22 #53
I feel like I've been towed orangecrush Mar 22 #54
Thank you for that luv2fly Mar 22 #56
Schumer has zero interest in exposing the Epstein crowd Ponietz Mar 22 #28
As did Biden and Clinton DaBronx Mar 22 #32
The con artist is the De facto leader of the Senate. Thune is just his puppet. Quiet Em Mar 22 #31
Not sure of the timing but Mark Kelly please and for Prez in 2028 after dutch777 Mar 22 #34
Based on the story at the link, shouldn't the headline read, "Chris Murphy Still Trying to Generate Interest lapucelle Mar 22 #36
. MorbidButterflyTat Mar 22 #48
Yes Boo1 Mar 22 #51
Schumer is compromised by his unquestioning support of Israel Mysterian Mar 22 #41
Whenever a thread title ends with ":report" it's usually wishful thinking. MineralMan Mar 22 #42
Oh yes...and I agree that "milquetoast" ain't gonna win the battle PCIntern Mar 22 #46
The only named quote MorbidButterflyTat Mar 22 #47
Well the author does have an eyestaggering 6 followers over at medium. GreenWave Mar 22 #55
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dems quietly weighing mov...»Reply #24