Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eko

(10,100 posts)
25. Jeeze.
Sun May 17, 2026, 02:13 AM
12 hrs ago

On 13 April, Iran announced its intention to enrich uranium to 60 per cent U-235. This was characterized by Iran as a response to a sabotage of its vast underground enrichment cascades at Natanz two days before. The move comes against the backdrop of sensitive negotiations happening in Vienna aimed at rescuing the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), and bringing the United States back into compliance with the deal.
Is there any reason you can think of for Iran wanting the US back in the JCPOA? Any?
If not here are some. legally binding relief from crushing economic sanctions, unfreeze billions of dollars in foreign assets, and normalize its international banking and oil exports.

You were correct with the 60%, but with further research done I found that you can even do it with 20%.
The IAEA considers HEU, which is defined as uranium enriched to 20 percent or greater, as a “direct use” material, meaning it “can be used for the manufacture of nuclear explosive devices without transmutation or further enrichment.”
https://thebulletin.org/2025/07/iran-can-still-build-nuclear-weapons-without-further-enrichment-only-diplomacy-will-stop-it/

All that being said you were still wrong with this statement. "They are enriching uranium for weapons." There are research reasons, medical reasons, even as shown political reasons. Your statement only gives one possible one that may be true. Saying with certainty that with no evidence they were actually trying to make a nuclear weapon is false. Is it possible sure, just as other answers are possible.

Which would you have rather happened, the US enters back into the JCPOA or where we are now?




Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Reminds me of W Bush defenders. Midnight Writer 22 hrs ago #1
Saddam was a terrible man but he was also a sworn enemy of Al-Qaeda. Al-Qaeda gave rise to ISIS. Bush skipped the... OGBuzz 22 hrs ago #4
Another Point On That ProfessorGAC 22 hrs ago #6
For the same reasons I don't believe that Iran has any interest in attacking the U.S., or Europe, or..... OGBuzz 21 hrs ago #11
As To Russia... ProfessorGAC 21 hrs ago #12
Their conventional military weakness is on full display in Ukraine. OGBuzz 21 hrs ago #14
Worry Is Reasonable ProfessorGAC 21 hrs ago #17
Iran has freely admitted that they are enriching uranium well beyond Melon 22 hrs ago #2
It will be Donald or Bibi who will set off the nukes. OGBuzz 22 hrs ago #5
Trump withdrew the United States from the Iran nuclear agreement. Emile 21 hrs ago #10
Trump is shit. Iran should not posses nuclear weapons. Melon 21 hrs ago #15
London! Riyadh!! Then what happens? dpibel 18 hrs ago #18
They simply did not and were not enriching it to 90%. Eko 13 hrs ago #22
So your stance is that the enrichment to 60% is for what exactly? To scare other nations that Melon 12 hrs ago #23
Jeeze. Eko 12 hrs ago #25
I think Iran would use a nuclear weapon for defensive purposes like other countries that have nuclear weapons AZProgressive 5 hrs ago #31
YES Skittles 22 hrs ago #3
And you know he's been thinking about it.... OGBuzz 22 hrs ago #8
Get the minuteman missile out of your eye before you pluck the drone out of their eye Whip-poor-will 22 hrs ago #7
If Iran had a nuke, none of this would be happening. BlueTsunami2018 21 hrs ago #9
"Little Rocket Man" over in North Korea agrees 100%. It's all about deterrence. OGBuzz 21 hrs ago #13
It's a kind of Faustian Bargain Disaffected 21 hrs ago #16
We have gone through this same song and dance when a country we don't like gets a nuke indusurb 18 hrs ago #19
100% OGBuzz 18 hrs ago #20
It amazes me dpibel 18 hrs ago #21
Several Iranian backed terrorist groups have used suicide bombings as a primary tactical tool Melon 12 hrs ago #24
The Ayatollah's never sacrifice themselves 303squadron 11 hrs ago #26
Just google "settler attacks" to find the equivalent. Eko 9 hrs ago #28
It is one thing to use suicide bombers, an entirely different thing to commit to killing your entire country. indusurb 5 hrs ago #29
Trump withdrew the United States from the Iran nuclear agreement. Emile 10 hrs ago #27
If crazy people with nukes would instantly use them D_Master81 5 hrs ago #30
It turns out the Strait was more important Johonny 4 hrs ago #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I am sick of Trump apolog...»Reply #25