Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Do you remember this from the Butler PA shooting? [View all]Ponietz
(4,511 posts)30. Low media literacy, information bubbles, and stress/fear
Warning signs
Certainty without evidence: I just know.
Everything is proof: any counterevidence becomes part of the plot.
Unfalsifiable claims: no possible evidence could change their mind.
Source asymmetry: dismisses mainstream sources automatically, trusts fringe sources uncritically.
Secret-knowledge appeal: feeling special for seeing what others dont.
Motive inflation: assuming every bad outcome must be deliberate.
Constant escalation: one theory leads to broader suspicion about everything.
How to talk to someone
Stay calm: mocking usually strengthens the belief.
Ask gentle questions: What evidence would change your mind?
Focus on one claim: dont argue about ten things at once.
Examine sources together: who produced it, whats the evidence, is it independently confirmed?
Affirm emotions, not the theory: I get why that feels unsettling.
Avoid identity threats: dont make it about them being stupid or gullible.
Plant doubt slowly: small cracks work better than direct confrontation.
Set limits: if it becomes obsessive or aggressive, disengage.
Best question to ask
What evidence would convince you this claim is false?
The answer shows whether the CT is evidence-based or identity-based.
Certainty without evidence: I just know.
Everything is proof: any counterevidence becomes part of the plot.
Unfalsifiable claims: no possible evidence could change their mind.
Source asymmetry: dismisses mainstream sources automatically, trusts fringe sources uncritically.
Secret-knowledge appeal: feeling special for seeing what others dont.
Motive inflation: assuming every bad outcome must be deliberate.
Constant escalation: one theory leads to broader suspicion about everything.
How to talk to someone
Stay calm: mocking usually strengthens the belief.
Ask gentle questions: What evidence would change your mind?
Focus on one claim: dont argue about ten things at once.
Examine sources together: who produced it, whats the evidence, is it independently confirmed?
Affirm emotions, not the theory: I get why that feels unsettling.
Avoid identity threats: dont make it about them being stupid or gullible.
Plant doubt slowly: small cracks work better than direct confrontation.
Set limits: if it becomes obsessive or aggressive, disengage.
Best question to ask
What evidence would convince you this claim is false?
The answer shows whether the CT is evidence-based or identity-based.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yes, it could be the whole thing was rigged. Feed the paranoia and blame the government. /nt
bucolic_frolic
6 hrs ago
#24
He put the blood pellet on his ear or an agent did when he was thrown down on the ground
kimbutgar
5 hrs ago
#26
What I remember is seeing him reach for his ear, at about the same time a shot
yellow dahlia
8 hrs ago
#3
https://butlerradio.com/sheriff-disputes-report-that-deputy-sheriff-exchanged-emails-with-crooks/ nt
CozyMystery
7 hrs ago
#5
Trump called so many people crooks, one named "Crooks" had apparently had enough of his shit, LOL.
RedWhiteBlueIsRacist
6 hrs ago
#19
I don't remember, but if he had an earpiece in that ear and struck it just right...
hlthe2b
5 hrs ago
#31