Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I was sobered to see some of the details of the revised DSA platform. [View all]patphil
(9,371 posts)10. The Democratic Socialist Party isn't the Democratic Party.
https://www.dsausa.org/
As per the website, it has about 100,000 members.
Yes, the republicans could try to link the two parties, but they are most definitely different.
Has DSA's agenda changed that much? I thought socialism has always called for public ownership of the means of production.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/socialism
As far as closing prisons is concerned, I've not read anything from any Democratic candidate that advocated that. Some have called for ending private ownership of "for profit" prisons. This is a good idea, since this type of prison is rife with abuse.
These prisons should be folded back into the public state and federal prison systems.
As per the website, it has about 100,000 members.
Yes, the republicans could try to link the two parties, but they are most definitely different.
Has DSA's agenda changed that much? I thought socialism has always called for public ownership of the means of production.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/socialism
As far as closing prisons is concerned, I've not read anything from any Democratic candidate that advocated that. Some have called for ending private ownership of "for profit" prisons. This is a good idea, since this type of prison is rife with abuse.
These prisons should be folded back into the public state and federal prison systems.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
124 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Just makes no sense and will convince many that the Dem party is not a left party but a communist one.
efhmc
Jun 28
#1
Right, I saw that part, which is a bare-ass minimum place to start. But didn't see anything about abolishing prisons.
WhiskeyGrinder
Jun 28
#11
Deleted tweets are not a platform, though. The OP said it was the platform.
WhiskeyGrinder
Jun 28
#24
Gaslighting absurdity. The fictional polling data and the claims that Democrats have "no real platform" ignores reality.
QueerDuck
Jun 28
#105
Let's be honest here, okay? Democrats have not "sat back on 40-year-old laurels"...
QueerDuck
Monday
#122
You can find the platform here. There are 'sobering' items you did not mention.
RandomNumbers
Jun 28
#71
Look, we can't be afraid of Republicans twisting our words. We KNOW that will happen.
Bluetus
Jun 28
#7
That is true, but I bet if a survey asked voters to pick which statement they agree with more,
RandomNumbers
Jun 28
#62
"Defund the police means defund the police" -- as one put it, had supporters in Congress.
betsuni
Jun 28
#99
Candidates need to present what will win their election, that is (hopefully)
RandomNumbers
Jun 28
#58
Needs to be repeated, and false claims Dems in minority could stop Republicans if they wanted to pushed back on.
betsuni
Jun 28
#96
Completely agree. The "purity test" platforms ignore the reality of competitive districts.
QueerDuck
Jun 28
#22
Please don't gaslight me. It says it right in the official, published DSA Platform.
QueerDuck
Jun 28
#92
I completely agree with you on the principle: the profit motive has absolutely no place in prisons or healthcare.
QueerDuck
Monday
#115
The issue is not a lack of campaign courage; it is the gap between campaign goals and structural reality.
QueerDuck
Monday
#120
If "changing ownership of large corporations to public ownership" is scarry to non-progressives I
in2herbs
Jun 28
#49
I personally more interested in fighting the Republican Party and it's harmful affects
walkingman
Jun 28
#81