Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I was sobered to see some of the details of the revised DSA platform. [View all]H2O Man
(79,498 posts)18. The majority of that 1/3
do not see any connection between their daily lives and "politics." I agree that is one area that Democrats at the grass roots level can and should focus on. Party leadership cannot, because the vast majority of those people do not listen to them. Yet that is not the #1 group the Democratic Party should be appealing to.
Unlike in the past, there are more independent registered voters than belong to either the Democratic or maga-republican party. We cannot afford to present the "less worse" choices, thinking that independents will have no choice but to vote our way. That has not worked out well in two of the three last presidential elections, when attempts to stretch our arms out of socket to reach those across the aisle.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
124 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Just makes no sense and will convince many that the Dem party is not a left party but a communist one.
efhmc
Sunday
#1
Right, I saw that part, which is a bare-ass minimum place to start. But didn't see anything about abolishing prisons.
WhiskeyGrinder
Sunday
#11
Deleted tweets are not a platform, though. The OP said it was the platform.
WhiskeyGrinder
Sunday
#24
Gaslighting absurdity. The fictional polling data and the claims that Democrats have "no real platform" ignores reality.
QueerDuck
Sunday
#105
Let's be honest here, okay? Democrats have not "sat back on 40-year-old laurels"...
QueerDuck
19 hrs ago
#122
OK, we can disagree about how much real fight there has been versus posturing
Bluetus
19 hrs ago
#124
You can find the platform here. There are 'sobering' items you did not mention.
RandomNumbers
Sunday
#71
Look, we can't be afraid of Republicans twisting our words. We KNOW that will happen.
Bluetus
Sunday
#7
That is true, but I bet if a survey asked voters to pick which statement they agree with more,
RandomNumbers
Sunday
#62
"Defund the police means defund the police" -- as one put it, had supporters in Congress.
betsuni
Sunday
#99
Candidates need to present what will win their election, that is (hopefully)
RandomNumbers
Sunday
#58
Needs to be repeated, and false claims Dems in minority could stop Republicans if they wanted to pushed back on.
betsuni
Sunday
#96
Completely agree. The "purity test" platforms ignore the reality of competitive districts.
QueerDuck
Sunday
#22
Please don't gaslight me. It says it right in the official, published DSA Platform.
QueerDuck
Sunday
#92
I completely agree with you on the principle: the profit motive has absolutely no place in prisons or healthcare.
QueerDuck
23 hrs ago
#115
The issue is not a lack of campaign courage; it is the gap between campaign goals and structural reality.
QueerDuck
19 hrs ago
#120
If "changing ownership of large corporations to public ownership" is scarry to non-progressives I
in2herbs
Sunday
#49
I personally more interested in fighting the Republican Party and it's harmful affects
walkingman
Sunday
#81