Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I was sobered to see some of the details of the revised DSA platform. [View all]RandomNumbers
(19,339 posts)71. You can find the platform here. There are 'sobering' items you did not mention.
https://platform.dsausa.org/
I'm assuming this is the legit website. You may be interested to explore it. (You have to click on the squares to get the more detailed bullet points).
There are at least 2 items there that I strongly believe would spell big trouble on the national Dem platform. But I will let others explore for themselves.
Reading this solidifies my view that I won't be likely to vote for a DSA candidate in a primary. (of course it depends on there being a better candidate on the ballot). But I will 100% vote for the Democrat in November - even if they are a DSA candidate.
It is sad, because some of their positions are spot on and great. But the idiotic ones will be the ones that get highlighted in a GE campaign.
I'm assuming this is the legit website. You may be interested to explore it. (You have to click on the squares to get the more detailed bullet points).
There are at least 2 items there that I strongly believe would spell big trouble on the national Dem platform. But I will let others explore for themselves.
Reading this solidifies my view that I won't be likely to vote for a DSA candidate in a primary. (of course it depends on there being a better candidate on the ballot). But I will 100% vote for the Democrat in November - even if they are a DSA candidate.
It is sad, because some of their positions are spot on and great. But the idiotic ones will be the ones that get highlighted in a GE campaign.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
124 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Just makes no sense and will convince many that the Dem party is not a left party but a communist one.
efhmc
Sunday
#1
Right, I saw that part, which is a bare-ass minimum place to start. But didn't see anything about abolishing prisons.
WhiskeyGrinder
Sunday
#11
Deleted tweets are not a platform, though. The OP said it was the platform.
WhiskeyGrinder
Sunday
#24
Gaslighting absurdity. The fictional polling data and the claims that Democrats have "no real platform" ignores reality.
QueerDuck
Sunday
#105
Let's be honest here, okay? Democrats have not "sat back on 40-year-old laurels"...
QueerDuck
Monday
#122
You can find the platform here. There are 'sobering' items you did not mention.
RandomNumbers
Sunday
#71
Look, we can't be afraid of Republicans twisting our words. We KNOW that will happen.
Bluetus
Sunday
#7
That is true, but I bet if a survey asked voters to pick which statement they agree with more,
RandomNumbers
Sunday
#62
"Defund the police means defund the police" -- as one put it, had supporters in Congress.
betsuni
Sunday
#99
Candidates need to present what will win their election, that is (hopefully)
RandomNumbers
Sunday
#58
Needs to be repeated, and false claims Dems in minority could stop Republicans if they wanted to pushed back on.
betsuni
Sunday
#96
Completely agree. The "purity test" platforms ignore the reality of competitive districts.
QueerDuck
Sunday
#22
Please don't gaslight me. It says it right in the official, published DSA Platform.
QueerDuck
Sunday
#92
I completely agree with you on the principle: the profit motive has absolutely no place in prisons or healthcare.
QueerDuck
Monday
#115
The issue is not a lack of campaign courage; it is the gap between campaign goals and structural reality.
QueerDuck
Monday
#120
If "changing ownership of large corporations to public ownership" is scarry to non-progressives I
in2herbs
Sunday
#49
I personally more interested in fighting the Republican Party and it's harmful affects
walkingman
Sunday
#81