Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Fiendish Thingy

(24,587 posts)
13. There are 13 districts currently
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 12:18 PM
Tuesday

Congress could also increase those.

Term limits would require an amendment to the constitution.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Court expansion - yea or nay? [View all] Fiendish Thingy Tuesday OP
This message was self-deleted by its author hedda_foil Tuesday #1
Good riddance Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #2
False MichMan Tuesday #4
This misses the point Bluetus Tuesday #3
That's still of form of expansion Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #5
Absolutely. Numbers like 9, 12, even 15 are just absurd Bluetus Tuesday #6
Why kill the filibuster? I favor expansion, but wnylib Wednesday #24
The filibuster is an archaic, Jim Crow era tool of obstruction and obfuscation Fiendish Thingy Wednesday #29
You describe the current use of the filibuster, which wnylib Wednesday #34
In either form, it is a tool of obstruction. Fiendish Thingy Wednesday #36
would be nice but that is even less likely to happen-- but certainly push the idea to move the Overton Window LymphocyteLover Tuesday #10
Exactly. We need to put bold, challening ideas forward Bluetus Tuesday #11
The people we put on won't be corrupt but the other side won't view it that way. A non-partisan solution would be good. LymphocyteLover Tuesday #12
When anybody sits on the court for decades with this kind of power Bluetus Tuesday #17
I can't argue with that LymphocyteLover Tuesday #18
I agree that we need people who are knowledgeable wnylib Wednesday #27
How many circuit districts are there? orthoclad Tuesday #7
There are 13 districts currently Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #13
That's why I say expand first. orthoclad Tuesday #15
R probably agree RoseTrellis Tuesday #20
We had the opportunity and bungled it orthoclad Tuesday #21
I believe in the "Other Shoe Intellectual Honesty Test" WarGamer Tuesday #8
You appear to have forgotten about McConnel's obstruction of Obama's nominees Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #14
The whole concept is absurd. We should be pushing for fundamental reforms. Bluetus Tuesday #16
What a ludicrous comment. BannonsLiver Wednesday #48
lol... WarGamer Wednesday #56
If we want to save America, we must EnergizedLib Tuesday #9
Expand or die. GoodRaisin Tuesday #19
Neither will happen in my lifetime MerryBlooms Tuesday #22
The widespread suffering you describe is why Dems are going to win the midterms Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #23
Not While There Is a Republican President and Senate Majority! MineralMan Wednesday #25
A Democrat in the Presidency can fire almost every Trump appointment and fire off a thousand new executive orders. RoeVWade Wednesday #26
A purge will be necessary in 2029 Fiendish Thingy Wednesday #30
Plan C: no_hypocrisy Wednesday #28
You think Dems will ever get 67 seats in the senate? Fiendish Thingy Wednesday #32
Expansion is a band-aid. Term limits are the real solution. tinrobot Wednesday #31
Term limits requires an amendment to the constitution Fiendish Thingy Wednesday #33
Never said it would be easy, but limits are the best solution. tinrobot Wednesday #45
Expanding the court is mandatory! the_liberal_grandpa Wednesday #35
Doomed how? Boo1 Wednesday #52
I never get excited about Supreme Court decisions PCB66 Wednesday #37
Maybe you're getting cynical Fiendish Thingy Wednesday #38
I'm talking about 60 years PCB66 Wednesday #50
Yup, that's cynicism Fiendish Thingy Wednesday #53
It is not going to happen bob4460 Wednesday #39
Only a simple majority is required Fiendish Thingy Wednesday #40
We need term limits. Initech Wednesday #41
Term limits requires an amendment to the constitution Fiendish Thingy Wednesday #42
We need term limits and we need to ban outside influence from groups like the Heritage Foundation. Initech Wednesday #43
Expansion must come first Fiendish Thingy Wednesday #46
Of course the first step *HAS* to be undoing the MAGA majority. Initech Wednesday #49
Idk Boo1 Wednesday #44
If republicans expanded the court now, we would only have to wait 2 years for our chance to do the same Fiendish Thingy Wednesday #47
The US House Boo1 Wednesday #51
So, everyone should wait 10 years rather than 2 to have their rights restored? Fiendish Thingy Wednesday #54
It must be done EnergizedLib Wednesday #55
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Court expansion - yea or ...»Reply #13