General Discussion

Fiendish Thingy

(24,556 posts)

23. The widespread suffering you describe is why Dems are going to win the midterms

Tue Jun 30, 2026, 06:26 PM

Tuesday

And regain the trifecta in 2028.

From there, they can expand the court, and govern fearlessly and unhesitatingly, or face rejection at the ballot box in the 2030 election from all those who continue to suffer.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

MerryBlooms

56 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Court expansion - yea or nay? [View all] Fiendish Thingy Tuesday OP

This message was self-deleted by its author hedda_foil Tuesday #1

Good riddance Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #2

False MichMan Tuesday #4

This misses the point Bluetus Tuesday #3

That's still of form of expansion Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #5

Absolutely. Numbers like 9, 12, even 15 are just absurd Bluetus Tuesday #6

Why kill the filibuster? I favor expansion, but wnylib 14 hrs ago #24

The filibuster is an archaic, Jim Crow era tool of obstruction and obfuscation Fiendish Thingy 13 hrs ago #29

You describe the current use of the filibuster, which wnylib 13 hrs ago #34

In either form, it is a tool of obstruction. Fiendish Thingy 12 hrs ago #36

would be nice but that is even less likely to happen-- but certainly push the idea to move the Overton Window LymphocyteLover Tuesday #10

Exactly. We need to put bold, challening ideas forward Bluetus Tuesday #11

The people we put on won't be corrupt but the other side won't view it that way. A non-partisan solution would be good. LymphocyteLover Tuesday #12

When anybody sits on the court for decades with this kind of power Bluetus Tuesday #17

I can't argue with that LymphocyteLover Tuesday #18

I agree that we need people who are knowledgeable wnylib 13 hrs ago #27

How many circuit districts are there? orthoclad Tuesday #7

There are 13 districts currently Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #13

That's why I say expand first. orthoclad Tuesday #15

R probably agree RoseTrellis Tuesday #20

We had the opportunity and bungled it orthoclad Tuesday #21

I believe in the "Other Shoe Intellectual Honesty Test" WarGamer Tuesday #8

You appear to have forgotten about McConnel's obstruction of Obama's nominees Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #14

The whole concept is absurd. We should be pushing for fundamental reforms. Bluetus Tuesday #16

What a ludicrous comment. BannonsLiver 9 hrs ago #48

lol... WarGamer 5 hrs ago #56

If we want to save America, we must EnergizedLib Tuesday #9

Expand or die. GoodRaisin Tuesday #19

Neither will happen in my lifetime MerryBlooms Tuesday #22

The widespread suffering you describe is why Dems are going to win the midterms Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #23

Not While There Is a Republican President and Senate Majority! MineralMan 13 hrs ago #25

A Democrat in the Presidency can fire almost every Trump appointment and fire off a thousand new executive orders. RoeVWade 13 hrs ago #26

A purge will be necessary in 2029 Fiendish Thingy 13 hrs ago #30

Plan C: no_hypocrisy 13 hrs ago #28

You think Dems will ever get 67 seats in the senate? Fiendish Thingy 13 hrs ago #32

Expansion is a band-aid. Term limits are the real solution. tinrobot 13 hrs ago #31

Term limits requires an amendment to the constitution Fiendish Thingy 13 hrs ago #33

Never said it would be easy, but limits are the best solution. tinrobot 9 hrs ago #45

Expanding the court is mandatory! the_liberal_grandpa 13 hrs ago #35

Doomed how? Boo1 6 hrs ago #52

I never get excited about Supreme Court decisions PCB66 12 hrs ago #37

Maybe you're getting cynical Fiendish Thingy 11 hrs ago #38

I'm talking about 60 years PCB66 7 hrs ago #50

Yup, that's cynicism Fiendish Thingy 6 hrs ago #53

It is not going to happen bob4460 9 hrs ago #39

Only a simple majority is required Fiendish Thingy 9 hrs ago #40

We need term limits. Initech 9 hrs ago #41

Term limits requires an amendment to the constitution Fiendish Thingy 9 hrs ago #42

We need term limits and we need to ban outside influence from groups like the Heritage Foundation. Initech 9 hrs ago #43

Expansion must come first Fiendish Thingy 9 hrs ago #46

Of course the first step *HAS* to be undoing the MAGA majority. Initech 9 hrs ago #49

Idk Boo1 9 hrs ago #44

If republicans expanded the court now, we would only have to wait 2 years for our chance to do the same Fiendish Thingy 9 hrs ago #47

The US House Boo1 6 hrs ago #51

So, everyone should wait 10 years rather than 2 to have their rights restored? Fiendish Thingy 6 hrs ago #54

It must be done EnergizedLib 6 hrs ago #55