Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Fiendish Thingy

(24,572 posts)
29. The filibuster is an archaic, Jim Crow era tool of obstruction and obfuscation
Wed Jul 1, 2026, 10:57 AM
Yesterday

The filibuster prevents an up or down floor vote, allowing a bill to die without any senator having to go on record opposing or supporting it. It is a tool to avoid accountability to the voters, substituting a shrug for courage.

Court expansion will never pass with the filibuster intact, nor would any legislation restoring lost rights or repairing the damage of the Trump era.

Think about your wish list of bills you’d like to see passed.

Reproductive rights? Blocked by the filibuster

Voting rights? Blocked by the filibuster

Campaign finance reform? Blocked by the filibuster

Anything that might be passed by reconciliation (none of the above issues qualify) could be overturned by the Roberts court unless the MAGA majority is neutralized via expansion.

Dems must never again govern out of fear of what republicans might do if they regained power.

Kill the filibuster, ram through dozens of progressive bills that benefit all Americans other than billionaires, and Dems will retain the trifecta for a generation or more (see: FDR and the New Deal).

If republicans ever regain the trifecta and try to undo all the progress made under democrats, then the record will be there to hold them accountable at the ballot box, rather than the smoke and mirrors of gridlock by filibuster.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Court expansion - yea or nay? [View all] Fiendish Thingy Tuesday OP
This message was self-deleted by its author hedda_foil Tuesday #1
Good riddance Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #2
False MichMan Tuesday #4
This misses the point Bluetus Tuesday #3
That's still of form of expansion Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #5
Absolutely. Numbers like 9, 12, even 15 are just absurd Bluetus Tuesday #6
Why kill the filibuster? I favor expansion, but wnylib Yesterday #24
The filibuster is an archaic, Jim Crow era tool of obstruction and obfuscation Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #29
You describe the current use of the filibuster, which wnylib Yesterday #34
In either form, it is a tool of obstruction. Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #36
would be nice but that is even less likely to happen-- but certainly push the idea to move the Overton Window LymphocyteLover Tuesday #10
Exactly. We need to put bold, challening ideas forward Bluetus Tuesday #11
The people we put on won't be corrupt but the other side won't view it that way. A non-partisan solution would be good. LymphocyteLover Tuesday #12
When anybody sits on the court for decades with this kind of power Bluetus Tuesday #17
I can't argue with that LymphocyteLover Tuesday #18
I agree that we need people who are knowledgeable wnylib Yesterday #27
How many circuit districts are there? orthoclad Tuesday #7
There are 13 districts currently Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #13
That's why I say expand first. orthoclad Tuesday #15
R probably agree RoseTrellis Tuesday #20
We had the opportunity and bungled it orthoclad Tuesday #21
I believe in the "Other Shoe Intellectual Honesty Test" WarGamer Tuesday #8
You appear to have forgotten about McConnel's obstruction of Obama's nominees Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #14
The whole concept is absurd. We should be pushing for fundamental reforms. Bluetus Tuesday #16
What a ludicrous comment. BannonsLiver Yesterday #48
lol... WarGamer 22 hrs ago #56
If we want to save America, we must EnergizedLib Tuesday #9
Expand or die. GoodRaisin Tuesday #19
Neither will happen in my lifetime MerryBlooms Tuesday #22
The widespread suffering you describe is why Dems are going to win the midterms Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #23
Not While There Is a Republican President and Senate Majority! MineralMan Yesterday #25
A Democrat in the Presidency can fire almost every Trump appointment and fire off a thousand new executive orders. RoeVWade Yesterday #26
A purge will be necessary in 2029 Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #30
Plan C: no_hypocrisy Yesterday #28
You think Dems will ever get 67 seats in the senate? Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #32
Expansion is a band-aid. Term limits are the real solution. tinrobot Yesterday #31
Term limits requires an amendment to the constitution Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #33
Never said it would be easy, but limits are the best solution. tinrobot Yesterday #45
Expanding the court is mandatory! the_liberal_grandpa Yesterday #35
Doomed how? Boo1 Yesterday #52
I never get excited about Supreme Court decisions PCB66 Yesterday #37
Maybe you're getting cynical Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #38
I'm talking about 60 years PCB66 Yesterday #50
Yup, that's cynicism Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #53
It is not going to happen bob4460 Yesterday #39
Only a simple majority is required Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #40
We need term limits. Initech Yesterday #41
Term limits requires an amendment to the constitution Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #42
We need term limits and we need to ban outside influence from groups like the Heritage Foundation. Initech Yesterday #43
Expansion must come first Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #46
Of course the first step *HAS* to be undoing the MAGA majority. Initech Yesterday #49
Idk Boo1 Yesterday #44
If republicans expanded the court now, we would only have to wait 2 years for our chance to do the same Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #47
The US House Boo1 Yesterday #51
So, everyone should wait 10 years rather than 2 to have their rights restored? Fiendish Thingy 23 hrs ago #54
It must be done EnergizedLib 23 hrs ago #55
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Court expansion - yea or ...»Reply #29