Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

karynnj

(61,243 posts)
69. I admit I read the sections you posted after posting
Wed Jul 1, 2026, 12:20 PM
1 hr ago

However, I still think what I wrote, knowing Clinton knows FAR, FAR more than I do.

I also do read Haaretz often enough that I know there is very little support for a two state solution and that many refer to moving to one as rewarding Hamas for Oct 7.

However, I think the Gaza Ceasefire and Trump's plan are mostly masking continued aggression on both sides and Israel increasing the footprint of the area it controls. Add in the situation in the West Bank and in Lebanon. Could this be going too far in the other direction?

I get that Clinton might think that by taking the position she did, she could influence the Europeans to engage with Trump on this and move him to a more reasonable position. This reminds me that many top foreign policy Democrats tried to do that with the more reasonable GWB, with their Iran votes only to find they had no influence and were seen as complicit in the very thing they were aiming to stop.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The plan is another "Perpetual Money and Real Estate Machine" for those "Epstein Class" scoundrels. usonian 11 hrs ago #1
i don't get it. why the hell is she inserting herself into this? did she HAVE to write something for the orleans 11 hrs ago #2
The Prospect article suggests she's doing it as a favour to Tony Blair muriel_volestrangler 6 hrs ago #15
Good grief Tony Blair favor? Nanjeanne 5 hrs ago #22
It's a measure of the awfulness of the "Board of Peace" that Blair may be the least corrupt and RW person on it muriel_volestrangler 4 hrs ago #28
If only the U.S. didn't put all those people in power... yardwork 1 hr ago #64
They're Trump's chosen board. Yes, the US is responsible for its makeup muriel_volestrangler 1 hr ago #67
Correct. We made our choice in November 2024. yardwork 1 hr ago #68
To use the famous Anglo-Saxon litotes... ananda 1 hr ago #65
Hillary has been speaking up quite a lot on issues lately Grim Chieftain 1 hr ago #70
This is edhopper 11 hrs ago #3
depressing indeed, but not so shocking, at least for me Celerity 11 hrs ago #4
Please wake me, I gotta be dreaming. oasis 11 hrs ago #5
No friend, I think it's called a nightmare Grim Chieftain 1 hr ago #72
Hillary Clinton has been right about Trump for over a decade. yardwork 1 hr ago #74
Well, we'll have to agree to disagree Grim Chieftain 55 min ago #76
The Financial Times op ed makes sense, calls for different control structure delisen 1 hr ago #75
So he bumbled into a Inkey 10 hrs ago #6
It doesn't look like an endorsement as much as it does another hard-to-accept lesson in reality for some. W_HAMILTON 10 hrs ago #7
Yes, of course Cirsium 10 hrs ago #8
Your words all appear in grammatical order, but they make no sense. muriel_volestrangler 7 hrs ago #13
But they are a tiny minority of Americans that swung the election to Trump. W_HAMILTON 4 hrs ago #29
It seems a bit of an obsession to take a Hillary Clinton op-ed in the Financial Times muriel_volestrangler 4 hrs ago #32
The words make sense. The same refusal to accept reality that gave us Trump is about to leave Gaza to his whims. SunSeeker 4 hrs ago #30
Don't capitulate to Trump. muriel_volestrangler 4 hrs ago #36
Ok, how do we achieve that? yardwork 3 hrs ago #46
I disagree that cooperating with the Board of Peace, led for life by Trump, is the only alternative. muriel_volestrangler 3 hrs ago #47
Who is in power now who can boycott Israel? yardwork 3 hrs ago #48
You do the boycott yourself. You look for decent Israeli politicians yourself muriel_volestrangler 2 hrs ago #49
My tiny little boycott of a few Israeli products is nothing. yardwork 2 hrs ago #52
Obviously we agree we don't elect politicians who support Trump muriel_volestrangler 2 hrs ago #55
U.S. politics is structured differently than Britain's. yardwork 2 hrs ago #59
Boom. yardwork 1 hr ago #63
Disgusting. David__77 8 hrs ago #9
Your 4th paragraph. I agree. harumph 3 hrs ago #42
My response would get me banned malaise 8 hrs ago #10
+1 There are things I would like to say too. Emile 6 hrs ago #16
That's where I am too Bettie 4 hrs ago #27
Mine too!! InAbLuEsTaTe 4 hrs ago #31
Same here PatSeg 2 hrs ago #51
Meh! malaise 2 hrs ago #53
Well, regarding this particular individual PatSeg 40 min ago #78
Likewise. H2O Man 41 min ago #77
Maybe Hillary knows more about Trump's Gaza plan than the rest of us? sop 28 min ago #82
Right white supremacists Whip-poor-will 7 hrs ago #11
I think of the 22 Democratic Senators who voted to confirm John Roberts and just cry Ponietz 7 hrs ago #12
What a revealing list. Emile 6 hrs ago #17
Here are the 22 Dems who voted to confirm Roberts: Celerity 6 hrs ago #19
Bingaman greatly disappointed on this vote -- he focused his career on energy and natural resources and, get this: Ponietz 3 hrs ago #44
Clarence Thomas was nominated by GHW Bush malaise 6 hrs ago #20
Obama was a no mountain grammy 5 hrs ago #23
When did HRC turn into Neville Chamberlin? no_hypocrisy 6 hrs ago #14
Seriously. InAbLuEsTaTe 4 hrs ago #33
Are we allowed to criticize DEMOCRAT HRC? Just wondering..... ColoringFool 6 hrs ago #18
Will never forget it... or forgive it. InAbLuEsTaTe 4 hrs ago #34
This message was self-deleted by its author tman 6 hrs ago #21
Extremely disappointing. La Coliniere 5 hrs ago #24
It's a big club, and you ain't in it. n/t flvegan 4 hrs ago #25
As Groucho said... GJGCA 4 hrs ago #26
"What does Goldman think?" Kid Berwyn 4 hrs ago #35
The Epstein Class malaise 4 hrs ago #37
Same class that looted the banks in 2008. Kid Berwyn 3 hrs ago #38
You nailed it malaise 3 hrs ago #39
She discussed this with David Remnick recently but all people focused on was her brief Joe Biden comments Quiet Em 3 hrs ago #40
Thanks for this information. It saved my respect oasis 3 hrs ago #41
You are very welcome Quiet Em 3 hrs ago #43
Thank you. betsuni 1 hr ago #73
I just read the entire statement and it isn't an endorsement. yardwork 3 hrs ago #45
As usual. She's right. At this point, our choices are limited and something needs to be done. QueerDuck 2 hrs ago #50
Thanks for summing it up succinctly. yardwork 2 hrs ago #54
She knows the "Peace Board" can be replaced leftstreet 2 hrs ago #56
Those who have been most critical of her for saying this, seem to be the same ones... QueerDuck 1 hr ago #60
Well said. yardwork 1 hr ago #62
The Board of Peace cannot be replaced; Trump is its head for life muriel_volestrangler 1 hr ago #66
Once Trump isn't president, the Board of Peace won't be especially relevant EdmondDantes_ 11 min ago #85
Progressives vs. Democrats MorbidButterflyTat 40 min ago #79
Wow 😳 MustLoveBeagles 2 hrs ago #57
I wonder if Hillary Clinton might be blinded by an assumption karynnj 2 hrs ago #58
If you read her op-ed I think you'll see that she is not promoting hegemony. yardwork 1 hr ago #61
I admit I read the sections you posted after posting karynnj 1 hr ago #69
I don't think Clinton believes it's possible to reason with Trump. yardwork 1 hr ago #71
Yes it does. AloeVera 28 min ago #81
For some reason this reminds me of the "facts on the ground" strategy. AloeVera 36 min ago #80
Sorry, no one gets to call themselves Rob H. 25 min ago #83
"Hillary Clinton endorses a Plan designed to thwart a future Palestinian state." AloeVera 21 min ago #84
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hillary Clinton Endorses ...»Reply #69