Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Fiendish Thingy

(24,556 posts)
40. Only a simple majority is required
Wed Jul 1, 2026, 02:37 PM
12 hrs ago

If enough courageous Dems are elected who will kill the filibuster.

If they fail to do so in 2029, it will be the beginning of the end of the Democratic Party.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Court expansion - yea or nay? [View all] Fiendish Thingy Tuesday OP
This message was self-deleted by its author hedda_foil Tuesday #1
Good riddance Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #2
False MichMan Tuesday #4
This misses the point Bluetus Tuesday #3
That's still of form of expansion Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #5
Absolutely. Numbers like 9, 12, even 15 are just absurd Bluetus Tuesday #6
Why kill the filibuster? I favor expansion, but wnylib 16 hrs ago #24
The filibuster is an archaic, Jim Crow era tool of obstruction and obfuscation Fiendish Thingy 16 hrs ago #29
You describe the current use of the filibuster, which wnylib 16 hrs ago #34
In either form, it is a tool of obstruction. Fiendish Thingy 15 hrs ago #36
would be nice but that is even less likely to happen-- but certainly push the idea to move the Overton Window LymphocyteLover Tuesday #10
Exactly. We need to put bold, challening ideas forward Bluetus Tuesday #11
The people we put on won't be corrupt but the other side won't view it that way. A non-partisan solution would be good. LymphocyteLover Tuesday #12
When anybody sits on the court for decades with this kind of power Bluetus Tuesday #17
I can't argue with that LymphocyteLover Tuesday #18
I agree that we need people who are knowledgeable wnylib 16 hrs ago #27
How many circuit districts are there? orthoclad Tuesday #7
There are 13 districts currently Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #13
That's why I say expand first. orthoclad Tuesday #15
R probably agree RoseTrellis Tuesday #20
We had the opportunity and bungled it orthoclad Tuesday #21
I believe in the "Other Shoe Intellectual Honesty Test" WarGamer Tuesday #8
You appear to have forgotten about McConnel's obstruction of Obama's nominees Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #14
The whole concept is absurd. We should be pushing for fundamental reforms. Bluetus Tuesday #16
What a ludicrous comment. BannonsLiver 12 hrs ago #48
lol... WarGamer 8 hrs ago #56
If we want to save America, we must EnergizedLib Tuesday #9
Expand or die. GoodRaisin Tuesday #19
Neither will happen in my lifetime MerryBlooms Tuesday #22
The widespread suffering you describe is why Dems are going to win the midterms Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #23
Not While There Is a Republican President and Senate Majority! MineralMan 16 hrs ago #25
A Democrat in the Presidency can fire almost every Trump appointment and fire off a thousand new executive orders. RoeVWade 16 hrs ago #26
A purge will be necessary in 2029 Fiendish Thingy 16 hrs ago #30
Plan C: no_hypocrisy 16 hrs ago #28
You think Dems will ever get 67 seats in the senate? Fiendish Thingy 16 hrs ago #32
Expansion is a band-aid. Term limits are the real solution. tinrobot 16 hrs ago #31
Term limits requires an amendment to the constitution Fiendish Thingy 16 hrs ago #33
Never said it would be easy, but limits are the best solution. tinrobot 12 hrs ago #45
Expanding the court is mandatory! the_liberal_grandpa 15 hrs ago #35
Doomed how? Boo1 9 hrs ago #52
I never get excited about Supreme Court decisions PCB66 15 hrs ago #37
Maybe you're getting cynical Fiendish Thingy 14 hrs ago #38
I'm talking about 60 years PCB66 9 hrs ago #50
Yup, that's cynicism Fiendish Thingy 9 hrs ago #53
It is not going to happen bob4460 12 hrs ago #39
Only a simple majority is required Fiendish Thingy 12 hrs ago #40
We need term limits. Initech 12 hrs ago #41
Term limits requires an amendment to the constitution Fiendish Thingy 12 hrs ago #42
We need term limits and we need to ban outside influence from groups like the Heritage Foundation. Initech 12 hrs ago #43
Expansion must come first Fiendish Thingy 12 hrs ago #46
Of course the first step *HAS* to be undoing the MAGA majority. Initech 11 hrs ago #49
Idk Boo1 12 hrs ago #44
If republicans expanded the court now, we would only have to wait 2 years for our chance to do the same Fiendish Thingy 12 hrs ago #47
The US House Boo1 9 hrs ago #51
So, everyone should wait 10 years rather than 2 to have their rights restored? Fiendish Thingy 9 hrs ago #54
It must be done EnergizedLib 9 hrs ago #55
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Court expansion - yea or ...»Reply #40