Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Moostache

(11,359 posts)
35. This is exactly why we need and must implement a wealth tax in place of the income tax...
Mon Jul 6, 2026, 11:37 AM
11 hrs ago

The federal government has run up a debt so large and so unthinkable that the only ways to retire it are - 1) runaway inflation, 2) systemic collapse and 3) jubilee and wiping out the banking sector and starting over fresh.

In general, the powers that be see these in about that same order - the LAST thing they will EVER do is allow themselves to be impoverished for the behavior and unconscionable theft of wealth that has gone on since Reaganomics first rolled out in '81. The top 0.01% of the wealthiest should be liquidated of all but a subsistence level (to them) $100M holding. If they cannot figure out how to survive on that much, well, then I guess they perish.

There is nothing underpinning the current stock market that is not part and parcel of this time - it is all BS, propped up by lies and misdirection while a select few try to abscond with the goods to presumably go to their private islands and live out their days in semi-hiding but with palatial estates and comforts while the rest of us burn and die. FUCK THEM! Eat the rich sounds better by the minute...

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

the proud boys will not be at our doors to discuss graduate school philosophy rampartd 14 hrs ago #1
lol - grad school philosophy? TBF 12 hrs ago #23
The response was about likelihood of an academic discussion with Proud Boys and MAGAts Roy Rolling 7 hrs ago #94
The point was the content, not the reading level. nt TBF 7 hrs ago #95
But only in groups! enigmania 3 hrs ago #103
When talking to the immature, one must speak at their level. liberal N proud 2 hrs ago #104
I thought dems were socialist? Now we are communists? Do they know ,? Srkdqltr 14 hrs ago #2
i got called a communist pinko pig in high school by my rop instructor. i wear thatt badge proudly!!!!!! AllaN01Bear 11 hrs ago #40
There isn't a Republican alive who knows the damn difference anymore, if they ever did. They've been pushing this shit Karasu 6 hrs ago #96
Yes i know. Srkdqltr 6 hrs ago #99
I have heard MAGAts use them together describing Democrats liberal N proud 2 hrs ago #105
Exactly! LakeVermilion 14 hrs ago #3
"I'm becoming a believer in a flat income tax rate for everyone with no deductions." MichMan 12 hrs ago #12
You'd be surprised what the "investor class" - TBF 12 hrs ago #24
I'm in. Joinfortmill 11 hrs ago #34
The rich typically have little "income" as it is defined in the tax code. harumph 12 hrs ago #15
This is exactly why we need and must implement a wealth tax in place of the income tax... Moostache 11 hrs ago #35
I could not have elaborated on this better. harumph 11 hrs ago #41
How would total wealth be calculated? MichMan 10 hrs ago #65
First off you'd need to define "wealth" - TBF 10 hrs ago #75
So, we don't want people to associate Democrat with Communist, but reference the writings of Karl Marx ? MichMan 9 hrs ago #76
Lol - I have never disparaged Marx - that's all you TBF 9 hrs ago #77
Marx correctly diagnosed a problem - even though the proposed cure was no good. harumph 9 hrs ago #80
I'd be happy with simply going after financial assets. KPN 6 hrs ago #97
Excellent summary of where we're at. nt TBF 10 hrs ago #73
hence "the rich need to pay their fair share in taxes" Skittles 9 hrs ago #86
A flat tax harms the poorest of us the most Bettie 10 hrs ago #56
100%. nt TBF 9 hrs ago #85
I don't think it's anything to get worked up about Kaleva 14 hrs ago #4
Even fewer know what an oligarch is. MichMan 11 hrs ago #53
With probably little effect Kaleva 10 hrs ago #71
If you are explaining why you aren't a communist, you are losing. gab13by13 13 hrs ago #5
So let Fox the GOP give you a label and do nothing so it sticks with idiot voters Chasstev365 13 hrs ago #9
I'm a Democrat, I support Democrats gab13by13 9 hrs ago #79
Calling them idiots and ignoring them hasn't exactly been working for the past 30 years either. meadowlander 8 hrs ago #93
Personally, I would just LMAO..... lastlib 13 hrs ago #6
Simple explanation: There are some things we can agree to share the cost of - Ocelot II 13 hrs ago #7
We currently have all of that under the current status quo MichMan 11 hrs ago #52
Yes, but the whole point is to avoid calling any of it socialism, Ocelot II 8 hrs ago #91
I'm not a pedophile! (Logic and discussion are cbabe 13 hrs ago #8
Easier: "Define communist/communism". No? Bye." niyad 13 hrs ago #10
Exactly. He who's explaining and defining... is losing. QueerDuck 10 hrs ago #67
Actually, that was not what I meant at all. When someone uses those niyad 5 hrs ago #100
Yes. My point was to agree with you... that Democrats (or liberals, or progressives) should... QueerDuck 4 hrs ago #102
Not afraid of Randall (republicans) anymore Blue Full Moon 13 hrs ago #11
I say they've only won 3 primaries out of the whole country creeksneakers2 12 hrs ago #13
But they are using a handful of candidates who call themselves socialists. SamuelAdams 12 hrs ago #14
They call themselves Democratic Socialists, not Socialists Wiz Imp 12 hrs ago #18
lol - they'll just come up with something else to call them TBF 12 hrs ago #26
The upcoming general election will pit candidates with an "R" behind their name against candidates with a "D"... Escape 12 hrs ago #16
Don't say New Deal SocialDemocrat61 12 hrs ago #17
I always say I like the Nordic model. That usually shuts them up. Joinfortmill 11 hrs ago #36
Nordic? SocialDemocrat61 11 hrs ago #42
Oh, for heaven sakes. Joinfortmill 11 hrs ago #54
Shouldn't we recognize SocialDemocrat61 10 hrs ago #58
I'm talking about the economic sytem... Joinfortmill 10 hrs ago #64
And the term Nordic SocialDemocrat61 10 hrs ago #68
I didn't create the name. It can be used to develop a basis Joinfortmill 10 hrs ago #69
So why shouldn't we come up with a better SocialDemocrat61 10 hrs ago #72
Editorial or a cite? Torchlight 10 hrs ago #59
Both and neither SocialDemocrat61 10 hrs ago #60
Editorial. Torchlight 10 hrs ago #61
Yes, SocialDemocrat61 10 hrs ago #62
Or anyone else under 100 years old. BannonsLiver 9 hrs ago #82
It really should not be hard to show people why they should be way more afraid of billionaires and... Ol Janx Spirit 12 hrs ago #19
Sounds good in theory BUT, Dave Id 12 hrs ago #20
Agree. When someone refuses to accept basic facts and reality, there spooky3 12 hrs ago #31
How about this angle MoseShrute 12 hrs ago #21
Given current beef, coffee and gas prices Torchlight 12 hrs ago #22
I don't believe in capitalism Farmer-Rick 12 hrs ago #25
Exactly capitalism needs poor people in order for that system to exist Alpeduez21 12 hrs ago #29
Gee, there are some capitalist countries out there with robust safety nets... harumph 9 hrs ago #90
Exactly right. Those countries have the "safety nets" but very few folks are falling into them. FadedMullet 5 hrs ago #101
Maybe the Dems in charge could get on board with the reality that socialist Dems are what the voters want Alpeduez21 12 hrs ago #27
Communism for billionaires keeps the oligarchs afloat bucolic_frolic 12 hrs ago #28
"In Communism, the government owns businesses (the means of spooky3 12 hrs ago #30
A 5th Grader could look up and understand the definition of "communist" William Seger 11 hrs ago #32
I like it. Short and simple. Even these bums can get it. Joinfortmill 11 hrs ago #33
Actually just let him ramble Blue Full Moon 11 hrs ago #37
Stop telling people you are a socialist Boo1 11 hrs ago #38
Way Simpler ProfessorGAC 11 hrs ago #39
Nope. Being affirmative with an unassailable label... reACTIONary 11 hrs ago #46
Nope - What I Said Is Not A Denial ProfessorGAC 10 hrs ago #63
What about both? The accusations about communists are stupid lies..... reACTIONary 10 hrs ago #74
That's Pretty Good ProfessorGAC 9 hrs ago #78
How defensive. That's a losing approach. David__77 11 hrs ago #43
As opposed to what? What would your approach be? reACTIONary 11 hrs ago #47
Go on the attack on something else. David__77 9 hrs ago #83
So, do a "pivot" to avoid .... reACTIONary 9 hrs ago #87
Yes he wants to play word games instead of talking about material issues David__77 9 hrs ago #88
Excellent! Avoid the socialist smear.... reACTIONary 11 hrs ago #44
No Cirsium 11 hrs ago #45
Found this on Facebook catbyte 11 hrs ago #48
Time to call Trump/GOP Nazis DemocracyForever 11 hrs ago #49
Great advice, totally logical and reasonable. But MAGAts will never accept the Democrats aren't communists because Martin68 11 hrs ago #50
Hand them a dictionary? krawhitham 11 hrs ago #51
We also need to attack: Here are three reasons why we say the Republican Party has been taken over by fascists... Doodley 10 hrs ago #55
Dem counties produce 70% of US economy. GOP counties contribute just 29%. blm 10 hrs ago #57
Keep it simple Blumancru 10 hrs ago #66
You're going to be a "communist" to them no matter what you say ck4829 10 hrs ago #70
This. Been that way for like 80 years. Why are people acting like this is news? This is the oldest trick in the book. Karasu 6 hrs ago #98
Jesus H Christ BannonsLiver 9 hrs ago #81
also add... mdbl 9 hrs ago #84
Basically a Democratic Capitalist. hadEnuf 9 hrs ago #89
Stay clear of Party for Socialism and Liberation. They are the communist party and trying infiltrate the LeftInTX 8 hrs ago #92
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How to handle the Democra...»Reply #35