Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

the proud boys will not be at our doors to discuss graduate school philosophy rampartd 21 hrs ago #1
lol - grad school philosophy? TBF 20 hrs ago #23
The response was about likelihood of an academic discussion with Proud Boys and MAGAts Roy Rolling 15 hrs ago #94
The point was the content, not the reading level. nt TBF 14 hrs ago #95
But only in groups! enigmania 11 hrs ago #103
When talking to the immature, one must speak at their level. liberal N proud 9 hrs ago #104
I thought dems were socialist? Now we are communists? Do they know ,? Srkdqltr 21 hrs ago #2
i got called a communist pinko pig in high school by my rop instructor. i wear thatt badge proudly!!!!!! AllaN01Bear 19 hrs ago #40
There isn't a Republican alive who knows the damn difference anymore, if they ever did. They've been pushing this shit Karasu 14 hrs ago #96
Yes i know. Srkdqltr 13 hrs ago #99
I have heard MAGAts use them together describing Democrats liberal N proud 9 hrs ago #105
Exactly! LakeVermilion 21 hrs ago #3
"I'm becoming a believer in a flat income tax rate for everyone with no deductions." MichMan 20 hrs ago #12
You'd be surprised what the "investor class" - TBF 20 hrs ago #24
I'm in. Joinfortmill 19 hrs ago #34
The rich typically have little "income" as it is defined in the tax code. harumph 20 hrs ago #15
This is exactly why we need and must implement a wealth tax in place of the income tax... Moostache 19 hrs ago #35
I could not have elaborated on this better. harumph 19 hrs ago #41
How would total wealth be calculated? MichMan 18 hrs ago #65
First off you'd need to define "wealth" - TBF 17 hrs ago #75
So, we don't want people to associate Democrat with Communist, but reference the writings of Karl Marx ? MichMan 17 hrs ago #76
Lol - I have never disparaged Marx - that's all you TBF 17 hrs ago #77
Marx correctly diagnosed a problem - even though the proposed cure was no good. harumph 17 hrs ago #80
I'd be happy with simply going after financial assets. KPN 14 hrs ago #97
Excellent summary of where we're at. nt TBF 17 hrs ago #73
hence "the rich need to pay their fair share in taxes" Skittles 17 hrs ago #86
A flat tax harms the poorest of us the most Bettie 18 hrs ago #56
100%. nt TBF 17 hrs ago #85
I don't think it's anything to get worked up about Kaleva 21 hrs ago #4
Even fewer know what an oligarch is. MichMan 18 hrs ago #53
With probably little effect Kaleva 18 hrs ago #71
If you are explaining why you aren't a communist, you are losing. gab13by13 21 hrs ago #5
So let Fox the GOP give you a label and do nothing so it sticks with idiot voters Chasstev365 21 hrs ago #9
I'm a Democrat, I support Democrats gab13by13 17 hrs ago #79
Calling them idiots and ignoring them hasn't exactly been working for the past 30 years either. meadowlander 16 hrs ago #93
Personally, I would just LMAO..... lastlib 21 hrs ago #6
Simple explanation: There are some things we can agree to share the cost of - Ocelot II 21 hrs ago #7
We currently have all of that under the current status quo MichMan 18 hrs ago #52
Yes, but the whole point is to avoid calling any of it socialism, Ocelot II 16 hrs ago #91
I'm not a pedophile! (Logic and discussion are cbabe 21 hrs ago #8
Easier: "Define communist/communism". No? Bye." niyad 20 hrs ago #10
Exactly. He who's explaining and defining... is losing. QueerDuck 18 hrs ago #67
Actually, that was not what I meant at all. When someone uses those niyad 12 hrs ago #100
Yes. My point was to agree with you... that Democrats (or liberals, or progressives) should... QueerDuck 12 hrs ago #102
Not afraid of Randall (republicans) anymore Blue Full Moon 20 hrs ago #11
I say they've only won 3 primaries out of the whole country creeksneakers2 20 hrs ago #13
But they are using a handful of candidates who call themselves socialists. SamuelAdams 20 hrs ago #14
They call themselves Democratic Socialists, not Socialists Wiz Imp 20 hrs ago #18
lol - they'll just come up with something else to call them TBF 19 hrs ago #26
The upcoming general election will pit candidates with an "R" behind their name against candidates with a "D"... Escape 20 hrs ago #16
Don't say New Deal SocialDemocrat61 20 hrs ago #17
I always say I like the Nordic model. That usually shuts them up. Joinfortmill 19 hrs ago #36
Nordic? SocialDemocrat61 19 hrs ago #42
Oh, for heaven sakes. Joinfortmill 18 hrs ago #54
Shouldn't we recognize SocialDemocrat61 18 hrs ago #58
I'm talking about the economic sytem... Joinfortmill 18 hrs ago #64
And the term Nordic SocialDemocrat61 18 hrs ago #68
I didn't create the name. It can be used to develop a basis Joinfortmill 18 hrs ago #69
So why shouldn't we come up with a better SocialDemocrat61 18 hrs ago #72
Editorial or a cite? Torchlight 18 hrs ago #59
Both and neither SocialDemocrat61 18 hrs ago #60
Editorial. Torchlight 18 hrs ago #61
Yes, SocialDemocrat61 18 hrs ago #62
Or anyone else under 100 years old. BannonsLiver 17 hrs ago #82
More importantly, a majority of Americans don't know what the New Deal is. progressoid 6 hrs ago #106
It really should not be hard to show people why they should be way more afraid of billionaires and... Ol Janx Spirit 20 hrs ago #19
Sounds good in theory BUT, Dave Id 20 hrs ago #20
Agree. When someone refuses to accept basic facts and reality, there spooky3 19 hrs ago #31
How about this angle MoseShrute 20 hrs ago #21
Given current beef, coffee and gas prices Torchlight 20 hrs ago #22
I don't believe in capitalism Farmer-Rick 19 hrs ago #25
Exactly capitalism needs poor people in order for that system to exist Alpeduez21 19 hrs ago #29
Gee, there are some capitalist countries out there with robust safety nets... harumph 16 hrs ago #90
Exactly right. Those countries have the "safety nets" but very few folks are falling into them. FadedMullet 12 hrs ago #101
Maybe the Dems in charge could get on board with the reality that socialist Dems are what the voters want Alpeduez21 19 hrs ago #27
Communism for billionaires keeps the oligarchs afloat bucolic_frolic 19 hrs ago #28
"In Communism, the government owns businesses (the means of spooky3 19 hrs ago #30
A 5th Grader could look up and understand the definition of "communist" William Seger 19 hrs ago #32
I like it. Short and simple. Even these bums can get it. Joinfortmill 19 hrs ago #33
Actually just let him ramble Blue Full Moon 19 hrs ago #37
Stop telling people you are a socialist Boo1 19 hrs ago #38
Way Simpler ProfessorGAC 19 hrs ago #39
Nope. Being affirmative with an unassailable label... reACTIONary 19 hrs ago #46
Nope - What I Said Is Not A Denial ProfessorGAC 18 hrs ago #63
What about both? The accusations about communists are stupid lies..... reACTIONary 17 hrs ago #74
That's Pretty Good ProfessorGAC 17 hrs ago #78
How defensive. That's a losing approach. David__77 19 hrs ago #43
As opposed to what? What would your approach be? reACTIONary 19 hrs ago #47
Go on the attack on something else. David__77 17 hrs ago #83
So, do a "pivot" to avoid .... reACTIONary 17 hrs ago #87
Yes he wants to play word games instead of talking about material issues David__77 17 hrs ago #88
Excellent! Avoid the socialist smear.... reACTIONary 19 hrs ago #44
No Cirsium 19 hrs ago #45
Found this on Facebook catbyte 19 hrs ago #48
Time to call Trump/GOP Nazis DemocracyForever 19 hrs ago #49
Great advice, totally logical and reasonable. But MAGAts will never accept the Democrats aren't communists because Martin68 18 hrs ago #50
Hand them a dictionary? krawhitham 18 hrs ago #51
We also need to attack: Here are three reasons why we say the Republican Party has been taken over by fascists... Doodley 18 hrs ago #55
Dem counties produce 70% of US economy. GOP counties contribute just 29%. blm 18 hrs ago #57
Keep it simple Blumancru 18 hrs ago #66
You're going to be a "communist" to them no matter what you say ck4829 18 hrs ago #70
This. Been that way for like 80 years. Why are people acting like this is news? This is the oldest trick in the book. Karasu 14 hrs ago #98
Jesus H Christ BannonsLiver 17 hrs ago #81
also add... mdbl 17 hrs ago #84
Basically a Democratic Capitalist. hadEnuf 17 hrs ago #89
Stay clear of Party for Socialism and Liberation. They are the communist party and trying infiltrate the LeftInTX 16 hrs ago #92
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How to handle the Democra...»Reply #106