Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Deadlines loom for answers in Clinton email probe as U.S. judge sets discovery [View all]NWCorona
(8,541 posts)23. And here's mine.
"This article has been updated.
Throughout the controversy over her use of a private e-mail system while she was secretary of state, Hillary Rodham Clinton has described her decision last year to turn over thousands of work-related e-mails as a response to a routine-sounding records request.
When we were asked to help the State Department make sure they had everything from other secretaries of state, not just me, Im the one who said, Okay, great, I will go through them again, Clinton said Sunday on CBSs Face the Nation. And we provided all of them.
But State Department officials provided new information Tuesday that undercuts Clintons characterization. They said the request was not simply about general record-keeping but was prompted entirely by the discovery that Clinton had exclusively used a private e-mail system. They also said they first contacted her in the summer of 2014, at least three months before the agency asked Clinton and three of her predecessors to provide their e-mails"
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/state-departments-account-of-e-mail-request-differs-from-clintons/2015/09/22/54cd66bc-5ed9-11e5-8e9e-dce8a2a2a679_story.html
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Deadlines loom for answers in Clinton email probe as U.S. judge sets discovery [View all]
Land of Enchantment
May 2016
OP
No, they asked her once. She didn't resist. But it took a month to go through 55,000 emails.
pnwmom
May 2016
#15
It took them five weeks from the time the letter was sent. And there was no official
pnwmom
May 2016
#30
The only thing we know for sure is that an official written request was sent on October 28.
pnwmom
May 2016
#32
I don't think the Times was the only news source that reported on the Summer negotiations.
Ash_F
May 2016
#33
After all, your source is Clinton's own website, and therefore completely trustworthy
Android3.14
May 2016
#35
Please prove that it isn't accurate that the first written request was sent on October 28.
pnwmom
May 2016
#37
And some Sanders supporters are lapping it up like water out of a dog bowl.
Chicago1980
May 2016
#19
seems like the Clinton folks are good at closing their ears, with lots of zzzzzzzzzzz's
tomm2thumbs
May 2016
#4
Indeed! Who needs any legally acceptable proof of guit when certain people are perfectly happy with
beastie boy
May 2016
#12
Hell I probably would take the 5th as well especially considering what they went on to nail
cstanleytech
May 2016
#10