Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(170,010 posts)
20. "but I am surprised she didn't realize that a woman speaker was more likely."
Mon Dec 15, 2025, 02:07 PM
Dec 2025

Probably because after she ran for her first term in the House in 1988 for the 101st Congress, there were only 29 women in the House and 2 in the Senate. She had run for the seat previously held by another woman who finished the term of her husband, one of Pelosi's friends, and had won 2 more terms before deciding not to run again.

When she was elected SOH for the 110th Congress almost 20 years later after the 2006 Democratic party rout, there were 72 women in the House and 16 in the Senate.

As of the 2024 election, in the 119th Congress, there are now 125 women in the House and 26 in the Senate.

To quote the old Virginia Slims ad - "You've come a long way baby".



And although today that ad would be considered sexist, there was a good write-up by the-now almost-defunct VOA in 2016 talking about what was going on back in the late '60s and recent politics - You've Come a Long Way, Baby. But It's Still a Man's Game

So given how much Congress has been "an institution by men, for men", one would naturally look more at the general populace itself for elevation of women in politics, given the demographics being more diverse there than in Congress (where the SOH is directly elected by members of Congress and not the general populace).

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

She is probably correct get the red out Dec 2025 #1
She is correct awesomerwb1 Dec 2025 #2
I hate to say it but i think the repugs will have a female president before us. Mr. Sparkle Dec 2025 #3
I remember saying this to my daughter long ago and she got so very, very mad at me. Still have that opinion. efhmc Dec 2025 #13
+1 dalton99a Dec 2025 #14
Sadly this old feminist has also given up and on DU I have also advised Dems not to run a female. efhmc Dec 2025 #4
ditto. I posted similarly and had one very opinionated male DUer attack me endlessly, as though he was more hlthe2b Dec 2025 #5
Your sadly correct. But we always need to remember Hillary WON the popular vote Bengus81 Dec 2025 #17
TY! It's better to Remember That even if effin' depressing! electric_blue68 Dec 2025 #30
You're not alone in your thoughts! slightlv Dec 2025 #19
I don't think she's wrong. MontanaMama Dec 2025 #6
Yes ... in my lifetime too FakeNoose Dec 2025 #7
So true. The NYT has already called Newsom the front runner. Lonestarblue Dec 2025 #9
I like him and I live in the middle of the US. Still pissed about this flag raising for Trump Bengus81 Dec 2025 #18
The first democtratic female President is going to have to happen organically, not forced. No thumbs on the scale. ToxMarz Dec 2025 #8
Great answer but am not so sure there are enough decent people left who would respond that way any more. efhmc Dec 2025 #10
The next election, I don't think anyone is going to take any chances and will be very conservative ToxMarz Dec 2025 #12
Sadly her main point is likely right dsc Dec 2025 #11
"but I am surprised she didn't realize that a woman speaker was more likely." BumRushDaShow Dec 2025 #20
Yes, if we extend this to other countries with female head s of state in developing countries fujiyamasan Dec 2025 #23
Ohio belongs on that list too dsc Dec 2025 #24
1) She's right LudwigPastorius Dec 2025 #15
Nancy Pelosi is 85 years old. Life expectancy... NNadir Dec 2025 #16
Actually Hamilton was a citizen at the time of the founding dsc Dec 2025 #25
I was wrong. It appears that the wording of the clause would have allowed... NNadir Dec 2025 #26
... BumRushDaShow Dec 2025 #28
This discourages potential female candidates thought crime Dec 2025 #21
I don't think so BumRushDaShow Dec 2025 #22
Her lifetime is probably 5-6 years or so. maxsolomon Dec 2025 #27
I hope she's wrong gemini_liberal Dec 2025 #29
I agree with her, because too many Americans are too stupid to vote for a woman president. And/Or too sexist. raccoon Dec 2025 #31
If we do get a female president, it will sadly be a right wing populist. Initech Dec 2025 #32
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Nancy Pelosi calls female...»Reply #20