Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

LetMyPeopleVote

(179,919 posts)
Tue Dec 23, 2025, 04:25 PM Dec 2025

Supreme Court rejects Trump's bid to deploy National Guard in Illinois [View all]

Source: NBC

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Tuesday rebuffed the Trump administration over its plan to deploy National Guard troops in Illinois over the strenuous objections of local officials.

The court in an unsigned order turned away an emergency request made by the administration, which said the troops are needed to protect federal agents involved in immigration enforcement in the Chicago area.

In doing so, the court at least provisionally rejected the Trump administration’s view that the situation on the ground is so chaotic that it justifies invoking a federal law that allows the president to call National Guard troops into federal service in extreme situations.

Those circumstances can include when “there is a rebellion or danger of a rebellion” or “the president is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.”

Among the issues in the case is what the term “regular forces” means, something the Supreme Court focused on in an order issued on Oct. 29 asking for additional briefing. The question is whether the law only allows for the National Guard to be called up if regular military forces are unable to restore order, or whether the phrase refers to law enforcement.

Read more: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-rejects-trump-bid-deploy-national-guard-illinois-rcna238630

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Was about to hit "post" BumRushDaShow Dec 2025 #1
It is extremely rare when I manage to beat you LetMyPeopleVote Dec 2025 #2
I was in the middle of washing up stuff from making cookie dough BumRushDaShow Dec 2025 #4
Here is a link to the ruling LetMyPeopleVote Dec 2025 #3
This looks like a 6-3 BumRushDaShow Dec 2025 #6
"In doing so, the court at least provisionally REJECTED the Trump administration's view... Septua Dec 2025 #5
What about the USSC popsdenver Dec 2025 #14
can't believe i'd ever be saying this but Takket Dec 2025 #7
Precisely. If he can't mobilize the Guard against imagined acts of insurrection in the streets . . . Journeyman Dec 2025 #10
From Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker: LetMyPeopleVote Dec 2025 #8
What?! The SCOTUS said, "No, Donny!!"? RussBLib Dec 2025 #9
I wish I wasn't shocked by SCOTUS issuing a reasonable opinion. TomSlick Dec 2025 #11
Dear Leader will NOT be pleased. Screw him Callie1979 Dec 2025 #12
'Hugely consequential': Experts say Supreme Court just wrecked Trump's plans LetMyPeopleVote Dec 2025 #13
Everyone keeps calling this a Christmas miracle but technically it's a Festivus miracle, iykyk LetMyPeopleVote Dec 2025 #15
Two late Trump court defeats 'could make a big difference in 2026': analyst LetMyPeopleVote Dec 2025 #16
NYT-How a Scholar Nudged the Supreme Court Toward Its Troop Deployment Ruling (gift article) LetMyPeopleVote Dec 2025 #17
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court rejects Tru...