Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(105,656 posts)
14. Yeah, I had been thinking he could use that as an excuse
Mon Jan 19, 2026, 11:08 AM
18 hrs ago

In fact, he actually increased his public appearances, going past his sister Anne to the number one spot:

But this year, Princess Anne has dropped to second place, though she was out and about even more in 2025, according to the list published by The Daily Mirror. The article, by Russell Myers and Jennifer Newton, based on Treble’s research with data up until December 18th, reveals that although the 75-year-old had 478 engagements, she was outpaced by her brother, 77-year-old King Charles. He carried out 532 official acts, netting him this crown in addition to that other one. [On the list published on December 31st by Treble, the total number adds to 533, as the King conducted one more engagement on December 19th].

That uptick in activity can be viewed as a sign that his health is indeed improving, a theory bolstered by an announcement the king made earlier this month. “Thanks to early diagnosis, effective intervention, and adherence to doctors’ orders, my own schedule of cancer treatment can be reduced in the new year,” the king said in a prerecorded message that aired as part of Stand Up to Cancer’s 2025 broadcast on the UK network Channel 4. “This milestone is both a personal blessing and a testimony to the remarkable advances that have been made in cancer care in recent years.”

https://www.vanityfair.com/style/story/king-charles-princess-anne-kate-middleton-hardest-working-royals

So it probably wouldn't seem a very believable excuse ("sorry, I'm washing my hair that week" ). While that would make it funnier, it also, realistically, makes it less likely he'd use it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Lest you forget. It is 2025 and there are still kings. Lunacy. twodogsbarking 20 hrs ago #1
God how some love their royals!😵‍💫 Floyd R. Turbo 19 hrs ago #4
Show Kings that were neutered from being authoritarian hundreds of years ago Bengus81 19 hrs ago #5
We Have The Rockettes twodogsbarking 19 hrs ago #7
2026 even. progressoid 18 hrs ago #8
Got me. The first time I wrote the new year I put down 2036. It's Wednesday and I don't know what the hell is going on. twodogsbarking 18 hrs ago #9
... Wednesdays 15 hrs ago #15
Heck, I have to check my phone calendar every day to see what's going on. progressoid 10 hrs ago #17
According to some Brits, the royals are a revenue + operation. paleotn 18 hrs ago #13
It is, however, a long time since a British head of state threatened to attack allies for their own gratification muriel_volestrangler 13 hrs ago #16
It will be interesting to see if a "King" Miguelito Loveless 20 hrs ago #2
Real king shouldn't even think of it. paleotn 18 hrs ago #11
Starmer has already said he won't suggest that, because it's not "pragmatic" or "in the national interest" muriel_volestrangler 20 hrs ago #3
It ultimately may be up to the king to decide. mwmisses4289 19 hrs ago #6
Yeah, I had been thinking he could use that as an excuse muriel_volestrangler 18 hrs ago #14
Starmer, it's going to get bad for the UK's national interests no matter what you do, paleotn 18 hrs ago #12
Charles looks extremely annoying. twodogsbarking 18 hrs ago #10
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Calls for King Charles to...»Reply #14