Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

FakeNoose

(41,016 posts)

10. "Selective enforcement" has been the problem all along

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Fri Feb 20, 2026, 11:46 AM

Yesterday

... because that's what brought in Rush Limbaugh's Repuke radio, and all of his horrible imitators.

Selective enforcement means no enforcement whenever the performers meet the approval of political leaders.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Navarro: Democratic president may use 'selective' FCC enforcement against talk radio [View all] BumRushDaShow Yesterday OP

In my wildest dreams. RandySF Yesterday #1

You and me both! BumRushDaShow Yesterday #2

Make it so! SunSeeker Yesterday #3

They're projecting again surfered Yesterday #4

if we have an ounce of intelligence we will go after right wing radio, fox, and every right-wing samsingh Yesterday #5

But the general public lacks intelligence mdbl Yesterday #7

Yes please!!! liberalla Yesterday #6

You got that goddamn right! Ray Bruns Yesterday #8

"...could trigger the FCC equal-time rule." Questions... Grins Yesterday #9

No, the equal time rule is not the same as the fairness doctrine. onenote Yesterday #11

"Selective enforcement" has been the problem all along FakeNoose Yesterday #10