Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

thesquanderer

(12,973 posts)

21. re: "These are things that have affected HIM (i.e., most particularly the tariffs loss), yet they are still there"

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Reply #20)

Sat Mar 7, 2026, 04:16 PM

Saturday

Trump personally advocated for tariffs. His ire about their being struck down is targeted at the supreme court justices who struck them down, not the advisors who were in sync with what he wanted them to say and do. That is nothing like Noem claiming that Trump personally approved her self-promoting expenditures.

As an aside, striking them down is not costing Trump (personally) "hundreds of billions of ill-begotten games." That money did not going into his pocket, nor will any refunds come out of his pocket. The amount of money the decision personally cost hm is zero.

No piece de resistance there to my mind!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

25 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Fed-up Republicans may soon 'punish' another Trump Cabinet member: report [View all] BumRushDaShow Saturday OP

Yep. Meanwhile Patel parties on. Raven123 Saturday #1

and Kegseth Skittles Saturday #2

a.k.a. Pete Hogshit peppertree Saturday #23

Bondi is tricky PuraVidaDreamin Saturday #3

Since she has already been confirmed BumRushDaShow Saturday #8

Ambassador, perhaps? Argentine right-wingers like her (particularly those of Italian descent) peppertree Saturday #25

Do they get a nice severance pay when they are fired? IcyPeas Saturday #4

Not if fired for cause. Old Crank Saturday #16

Impeach Chump ... and get them ALL OUT ... make it a full sweep FakeNoose Saturday #5

MAGA's male cabinet secretaries need to go too IronLionZion Saturday #6

Handling of Epstein files? That's not a bug, Republicans. That's a "feature". paleotn Saturday #7

I don't see a male/female difference here. thesquanderer Saturday #9

No "difference" in their BEHAVIOR in their jobs BumRushDaShow Saturday #11

I was indeed talking about how Trump handles them. I think he is an equal opportunity dismisser. thesquanderer Saturday #12

"You describe his actions as "almost" as egregious (so, not quite as much)" BumRushDaShow Saturday #14

I'm not saying Trump isn't a misogynist, but I just don't think it's very relevant in this case. thesquanderer Saturday #19

As I wrote further downthread BumRushDaShow Saturday #20

re: "These are things that have affected HIM (i.e., most particularly the tariffs loss), yet they are still there" thesquanderer Saturday #21

"Trump personally advocated for tariffs." BumRushDaShow Saturday #22

Sadly nwduke Saturday #10

It is not really "female purge." We do not run a country by former beauty queens. question everything Saturday #13

45 likes his "trophy" (fill in blank - wives, agency heads, etc) BumRushDaShow Saturday #15

"All the best people." SergeStorms Saturday #17

Get rid of the women. Keep the men. yardwork Saturday #18

President Obama looked for competence in his female appointments; Trump looks for blond hair and a worshipping artemisia1 Saturday #24