Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OldBaldy1701E

(11,267 posts)
31. 'Outsized'?
Wed Apr 15, 2026, 09:17 AM
Yesterday

It appears to be more 'equal footing' than 'outsized'.

Is that what bothers the large states so much?

Having to treat the smaller states as equals?

To be honest, I am fine with the President being elected solely by popular vote.

But, this constant desire to remove the equal footing that the smaller states have is getting a bit concerning. Creating a bias in the way Congress operates by letting the large states always win everything is no different than having a 'super majority' in both chambers. We don't seem to like the one. Why are we so enamored of the other?

There is also the fact that most of the 'small states' are on the north east coast. So, it would not just be a bias against certain states, it would be a bias against an entire section of the country.

But hey... what do I know?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K&R, thanks for posting. c-rational Tuesday #1
The Roberts court would overturn it Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #2
Unless it's a Constitutional amendment. Wednesdays Tuesday #5
Well, not yet they haven't. Nt Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #7
Yeah, because it's not "ripe" yet. nt Wednesdays Tuesday #10
They wouldn't need to strike it down. Starfury Tuesday #22
The Colorado ruling was unanimous Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #24
Not just Roberts and the other 5... Polybius Tuesday #19
"Supporters...argue that the delegation of electors is a state power, not federal..." Wednesdays Tuesday #3
There's no solutions like bucolic_frolic Tuesday #4
I don't follow your logic Fiendish Thingy Tuesday #9
So, to play devils advocate. OldBaldy1701E Yesterday #27
Currently, small states have outsized power and representation Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #30
'Outsized'? OldBaldy1701E Yesterday #31
The senate is the equalizer Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #33
This only affects the presidency, not congress. eggplant Tuesday #13
Not sure- R0ckyRac00n Tuesday #14
Fun until OH, FL find extra 300,000 votes. Festivito Yesterday #32
Lots of the same Democrats who support displacedvermoter Tuesday #6
Thomas Court would overturn if passed Miguelito Loveless Tuesday #8
It'll be at least a 7-2 decision Polybius Tuesday #21
Not if there are 13 justices ruling Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #34
The ANTI-SHITSTAIN Law/compact dave99 Tuesday #11
...popular vote deciding winner of presidential elections. as it should be. republianmushroom Tuesday #12
The EC is way overdue to die Bayard Tuesday #15
Hey, BumRush... calimary Tuesday #16
Appreciate the comment BumRushDaShow Tuesday #18
After 2000--and certainly after 2016--every Democrat should be on board with this by now. If the GOP wants to tie Karasu Tuesday #17
The EC invites shenanigans The Wizard Tuesday #20
Georgia will never go for this............... NGeorgian Tuesday #23
It's not as solld red as states like OK or ID BumRushDaShow Yesterday #25
Seems like there's a workaround for the compact issue Shrek Yesterday #26
That video answered questions I didn't even know I had Ruby the Liberal Yesterday #28
"at least stop electing by land mass instead of voters." BumRushDaShow Yesterday #29
Of course, if the votes are not counted correctly.... returnee 22 hrs ago #35
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»US edges closer to popula...»Reply #31