Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

karynnj

(61,087 posts)
14. As to not work, remember the name is similar to the Iron dome in Israel
Thu May 14, 2026, 10:34 AM
Thursday

That "dome" has an easier job as Israel is considerably smaller. If the criterion for working is that it stops all missiles etc, it doesn't, but it makes a huge difference in the number of missiles that do hit. This however is at a huge ongoing cost.

The real "dome" for the US is the combination of the Atlantic and Pacific oceans in addition to Canada and Mexico. Preserving that natural and geopolitical dome was thr basis of how we perceived the missiles placed in Cuba during the Kennedy administration.

However, neither the Iron Dome or our geography would protect a nuclear attack. There what has prevented any attack is the idea that doing so is Mutually assured destruction (MAD) My concern especially with the current administration, is if they are led to believe that 100 percent nothing can come in thru the golden dome, they might think they could use a nuclear weapon, but would be protected.

Not to mention that 911 showed we were not protected because our own technology could be used against us.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump's 'Golden Dome' wil...»Reply #14