Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

WSHazel

(927 posts)
4. There is no rational reason to build new nuclear plants
Tue Jun 23, 2026, 06:33 PM
Jun 23

Future increases in demand for electricity are dependent on massive increases in data center demand, which is economically impossible. Either the LLMs are going to get a lot more efficient, reducing demand for data centers, or the LLMs fail altogether, which reduces data center demand. Either way, straight lining capacity need off projected growth while holding technology steady, is an asinine assumption.

If the markets don’t need all these data centers, they won’t need huge, fixed production power plants that use old technology like nuclear power.

If there is a gap in power needs vs. capacity and there must be more power generation, using alternative to fill the gap is the logical path since it is so much cheaper than nuclear and it doesn’t compute. It also has much shorter lead times than nuclear.

Finally, if it is determined that nuclear must be part of the equation, why wouldn’t the market wait for miniaturization of nuclear which seems likely in the next 5 years.

In other words, there is no reason to start building expensive nuclear power plants that take a decade to build, may be unnecessary, and will certainly be obsolete by the time they are operational.

Recommendations

8 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Nuclear reactors themselves don't bother me GenThePerservering Jun 23 #1
True that! Hopefully... reACTIONary Jun 23 #9
They've slashed safety regulations for plant construction/operation. There were posts here about that some time back. highplainsdem Jun 23 #13
Just found the thread I posted then, which links to another thread about it: highplainsdem Jun 23 #14
Thanks! reACTIONary Jun 23 #15
It seems that these changes apply.... reACTIONary Jun 23 #17
They've been weakening safety requirements everywhere. Contnuing to do so with nuclear reactors. See highplainsdem Jun 23 #20
Thanks! reACTIONary Jun 23 #24
Response from the AGs of several Democratic states: highplainsdem Jun 23 #22
We had one built in Kansas 40 years ago and it sky rocketed our rates. All they've Bengus81 Jun 24 #29
Most likely as dedicated power for data centers. pecosbob Jun 23 #2
And what are their plans for the nuclear waste? nt pnwmom Jun 23 #3
They will let Dems take care of that small problem. republianmushroom Jun 23 #7
There is no rational reason to build new nuclear plants WSHazel Jun 23 #4
You're overthinking it maxrandb Jun 23 #18
my $2800 solar rooftop been working silently for 18 yrrs and NO cost overrun. paid off 10 yrs ago msongs Jun 23 #5
But wind turbines cause cancer. republianmushroom Jun 23 #6
If Congress has the purse and must approve what the expenditure is for, how does F45 have the in2herbs Jun 23 #8
These loans are financed.... reACTIONary Jun 23 #10
Not Enough modrepub Jun 23 #11
Yeah, just wait not fooled Jun 23 #12
Those plants were so GD expensive to build forty years ago it almost BK KG&E in Kansas Bengus81 Jun 24 #30
Same company that built the reactors at Fukushima flamingdem Jun 23 #16
I keep feeling something inside me that says we're in for a major slightlv Jun 23 #19
Better this than gas power plants which will have killed billions of people... hunter Jun 23 #21
Hmmm lonely bird Jun 23 #23
maybe we can convince them that neutrons have life-extending properties? DBoon Jun 24 #26
How about we build one in the West palm beach area? Bengus81 Jun 24 #31
Just kick that plutonium waste down the road for future generations to worry about. LudwigPastorius Jun 24 #25
Moron.Hurry up and bed down for your dirt nap. 58Sunliner Jun 24 #27
Trump is paying billions to cancel wind power while paying billions more to support nuclear power. Lonestarblue Jun 24 #28
I think I'd rather see one Diablo Canyon sized nuclear power plant... hunter Jun 24 #32
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump administration anno...»Reply #4