Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

QueerDuck

(2,302 posts)
83. I understand perfectly. The voters hold the ultimate power.
Mon Jun 29, 2026, 02:07 PM
Monday

Last edited Mon Jun 29, 2026, 04:43 PM - Edit history (1)

And I think that most reasonable people understand that the DCCC cannot dictate a nominee. The DCCC does not do the voting. The local grassroots voters in your district do. If the local electorate wanted a different candidate, they had every right and opportunity to vote for them. The national party can offer financial backing or endorsements, but they cannot force a single hand to pull a lever in a primary booth.

I am a voter, not a DC consultant... I'm just telling it like it is. Resorting to talking points about "cushy ivory towers" is just an easy way to avoid acknowledging the actual point about regional math. The reality of competitive swing districts does not change whether a campaign is managed by a local grassroots team or a national committee.

The framing of a campaign committee's investment as being a "dictatorship" diminishes the very meaning of the word. It's just over-emotional hyperbole. Furthermore, while affordability, corruption, and preserving democracy are absolutely universal concerns, the solutions that voters are willing to accept vary wildly by region.

What a voter in a +20 Democratic district considers an effective solution for affordability looks completely different to a moderate independent in an R+5 swing district. Acknowledging those regional differences and running candidates tailored to win them is not "caving." It is strategy.

You mentioned "reality" earlier... here's reality that needs to be accepted: Democrats win by expanding our tent, not by alienating the voters we need to reach 218. We do NOT win by running "pure" candidates who cannot win in a R+5 swing district.

We also do not win by making absurd suggestions that the Democratic Party (the only institutional wall standing against authoritarianism) has spent "25 years doing nothing." First of all, that's false. Second of all, that is a DSA talking point that only serves to demoralize our own base.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Uggh. Slotkin went on with Stephen A. Smith... hlthe2b Jun 26 #1
We all know she is right. Many here have agreed that Chuckee is a wet noodle. Just about anyone else would do a Exp Jun 26 #8
Which was not my point... clearly never even mentioned that. It was the venue. hlthe2b Jun 26 #10
Doesn't matter if she's on Fox or PBS, she's telling it like it is. She's always had a good message so going on any Exp Jun 26 #13
Again, NOT MY POINT. Clearly you know nothing about Stephen A. Smith. Bye. Done. hlthe2b Jun 26 #14
He's the Af-Am sports guy who gets political. I too think he's an idiot. But that doesn't matter. eom Exp Jun 26 #15
Who gives a rat's bum about Smith? Obviously she got the message out. And she is 100% right. flashman13 Jun 26 #31
Why do all these losers have large platforms? mdbl Jun 27 #48
I also think that Ken Martin has not been an effective leader for the DNC. Lonestarblue Jun 26 #12
Post removed Post removed Jun 26 #17
Good call Mig popsdenver Jun 26 #30
Just a quick reality check on this: David Hogg wasn't actually kicked out of the DNC. QueerDuck Jun 27 #47
Not that they actually have abided by that edict in the past. LiberalLovinLug Jun 27 #54
Nobody is saying party insiders don't have their biases... QueerDuck Jun 27 #64
They HAVE worked against outsiders. If Sanders is an "outsider" LiberalLovinLug Jun 27 #66
There's no doubt 2016 had its share of ugly behind-the-scenes insider bias and messy administrative drama... QueerDuck Jun 27 #67
DCCC is involved in dem Congressional primaries DemocracyForever Jun 27 #55
I completely get the frustration with national committees getting involved in local primaries... QueerDuck Jun 27 #63
They're interfering in my CD primary and I didn't vote for their candidate DemocracyForever Jun 28 #77
I completely understand the local frustration, but the math doesn't change. QueerDuck Monday #78
GOP lite is a bad strategy DemocracyForever Monday #79
With 24 years of campaign experience, you know firsthand that the political landscape varies wildly by geography... QueerDuck Monday #80
You don't understand that we the people decide party nominees DemocracyForever Monday #82
I understand perfectly. The voters hold the ultimate power. QueerDuck Monday #83
Post removed Post removed Monday #84
This isn't about me. Goodbye. QueerDuck Monday #85
Calm down, that was over the line. marble falls Monday #86
I can't stand him kimbutgar Jun 26 #18
Our elected representatives should not live in bubbles Soul_of_Wit Jun 26 #19
So, not the point. Slotkin can go on any program, but she should not give him the attention hlthe2b Jun 26 #20
I apparently touched a nerve Soul_of_Wit Jun 26 #23
Post removed Post removed Jun 26 #24
This is a gratuitously nasty and arrogant response Akakoji Jun 26 #25
What a "polite" thing to say... hlthe2b Jun 26 #26
It apparently seems to work Akakoji Jun 27 #46
Sounds serious Torchlight Jun 27 #68
I share . . . Scubamatt Jun 26 #22
I often have that sentiment on these issues re:inner workings of the party Raven123 Jun 26 #36
Looks like someone was not included dave99 Jun 26 #2
I wholeheartedly agree awesomerwb1 Jun 26 #3
Oh, hey, old buddy. blm Jun 26 #4
blm!!!! DrFunkenstein Jun 26 #6
😘 blm Jun 26 #7
is she volunteering to be the new leadership? msongs Jun 26 #5
She's got a ways to go given her yes vote on the Laken Riley Act. LuvLoogie Jun 26 #9
...not volunteering so much as lobbying to be it. LudwigPastorius Jun 26 #40
It appears so. Akakoji Jun 27 #69
Slotkin is awesome. She was brave as a brand new Rep in Congress to vote for impeaching TSF. That was a biggie Exp Jun 26 #11
I'm guessing she wants to be majority leader Fiendish Thingy Jun 26 #16
Me too Katcat Jun 26 #21
Looking at the results of the *past decade* not the past 1-2 years, that's a "no shit" conclusion. RockRaven Jun 26 #27
No kidding - these problems within the party should have been addressed at least 16 years ago. NT Midwestern Democrat Jun 27 #45
They should've been addressed with the DemocracyForever Jun 27 #56
Sorry To Inform You.... DAngelo136 Jun 26 #28
The entire Congressional Black Caucus hit back on her statement Quiet Em Jun 27 #50
I agree with you on Jeffries JBTaurus83 Jun 27 #52
Well said! DemocracyForever Jun 27 #57
Stephen A. Smith??? Cirsium Jun 26 #29
I agree Skittles Jun 26 #32
Power is hard to give up. Mark.b2 Jun 26 #34
yeah, I know Skittles Jun 26 #39
"Strongly worded letters" didn't cut it Ponietz Jun 26 #33
Chuck and Hakeem beg to differ Charlie Chapulin Jun 26 #35
No comparison between Hakeem and Chuck DemocracyForever Jun 27 #58
Why is this so fucking hard. Baitball Blogger Jun 26 #37
We don't cater to corporations creeksneakers2 Jun 27 #44
Totally disagree. Baitball Blogger Jun 27 #53
Back in the 60s they stopped the war creeksneakers2 Jun 27 #59
Not interested in revisiting the past. Baitball Blogger Jun 27 #62
Progressives make us lose. creeksneakers2 Jun 27 #65
Didn't read anything past the first sentence. Baitball Blogger Jun 27 #70
Why didn't you read it? creeksneakers2 Jun 28 #73
It's simple Magoo48 Jun 26 #38
She's right. I don't disagree. lees1975 Jun 26 #41
Please explain how leaders such as Schumer and Jeffries are to blame Akakoji Jun 27 #42
She wasn't elected to the Senate until 2024 MichMan Jun 27 #49
She has been in the Federal Government since 2014 Akakoji Jun 27 #71
Not one Senate Democrat voted against Garland as AG MichMan Jun 28 #72
I was extremely vocal at the time. Akakoji Jun 28 #74
"Where was she when Biden nominated and tolerated Garland?" MichMan Jun 28 #75
Current dem Senate don't fight back strategy is the real problem DemocracyForever Jun 27 #60
We need to concentrate on stopping Trump creeksneakers2 Jun 27 #43
Any suggestions for substitution? no_hypocrisy Jun 27 #51
Senator Chris Van Hollen DemocracyForever Jun 27 #61
Why does she hate her own Party? JustAnotherGen Jun 28 #76
I've seen many posts here critical of Schumer's effectiveness MichMan Monday #81
Considering she says this to Stephen A Smith scares me on what kind of leadership she prefers AZProgressive Monday #87
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Slotkin calls for 'new le...»Reply #83