Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onenote

(46,473 posts)
11. They haven't succeeded in several other cases.
Thu Jul 2, 2026, 03:59 PM
Jul 2

And he's got a very good lawyer.

The statute he's being charged under reads as follows: Whoever maliciously injures or breaks or destroys, or attempts to injure or break or destroy, by fire or otherwise, any public or private property, whether real or personal, not his or her own, of the value of $1,000 or more, shall be fined not more than the amount set forth in § 22-3571.01 or shall be imprisoned for not more than 10 years, or both, and if the property has some value shall be fined not more than the amount set forth in § 22-3571.01 or imprisoned for not more than 180 days, or both."

Typically, convicting someone of the crime of malicious destruction of property requires proof, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant acted with willful intent, not by accident or mistake, with ill will, spite, or a willful disregard of a known risk that the property would be harmed and without excuse or mitigating circumstances.

Pirro is going to have a tough time convincing a jury that someone who saw a floating piece of debris on the reflecting pool and picked it up acted with willful, malicious intent or that the value of the piece of floating debris was $1000 or more. My guess is that they were able to obtain the indictment by claiming that the value of the damage should measured against the value of the entire reflecting pool.

Recommendations

9 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I hope they don't order a firing squad. PittBlue Jul 2 #1
Operation Distraction still ongoing sakabatou Jul 2 #2
Arrested on phony charges popsdenver Jul 2 #46
Said they have their own witnesses snowybirdie Jul 2 #3
Will they testify they saw him with a knife cutting a 300' gash in the middle of the pool Martin Eden Jul 2 #15
Dragging it along his canoe...? displacedvermoter Jul 2 #42
They lied. There are no witnesses because he did nothing illegal. Wiz Imp Jul 2 #16
Hearn is facing a 10 year prison sentence because Trump needs a scapegoat for his blithering incompetence. LudwigPastorius Jul 2 #4
DOJ will lose this case. Wiz Imp Jul 2 #14
Not at all relevant Cirsium Jul 2 #32
DOJ will lose their lawsuit against him, hell they never even found a knife on him. KS Toronado Jul 2 #44
As I said... Cirsium Jul 2 #49
If facing 10 years, he gets a jury trial if he wants it. We know judge Jeanine's win-loss record on jury trials. 3Hotdogs Jul 3 #56
This is going to be almost as funny a trial as the sandwich thrower one jgmiller Jul 2 #5
I don't think it's funny LisaL Jul 2 #7
Nothing funny about a 10-year sentence... regnaD kciN Jul 2 #9
They haven't succeeded in several other cases. onenote Jul 2 #11
Pirro couldn't kick a duck in the ass. . . DinahMoeHum Jul 2 #43
You don't think that the DOJ will comb through every last word that he posted on social media over the past decade? LudwigPastorius Jul 3 #53
Do you think they didn't do that in the other cases they lost? onenote Jul 3 #61
Can they televise the jury trial? BarbD Jul 2 #6
He definitely should demand the jury trial. LisaL Jul 2 #8
It's a federal case, so no. LeftInTX Jul 2 #12
What evidence could they have shown a grand jury? Accurate evidence or misleading evidence? nt wiggs Jul 2 #10
Body cam video.... SergeStorms Jul 2 #20
As I recall he was LisaL Jul 2 #28
Probably not. SergeStorms Jul 2 #34
Isn't the pool under 24/7 video surveillance ? Jarqui Jul 2 #50
Sounds like they were more upset over Hearns attitude than anything. LeftInTX Jul 2 #13
I agree... I think the case will be thrown out in the end...just like with the other cases slightlv Jul 2 #18
Hearn can decide if he wants a jury or bench trial. LeftInTX Jul 2 #19
I think he definitely should demand a jury trial. LisaL Jul 2 #26
MaddowBlog-Grand jury indicts former Olympian in Trump DOJ's Reflecting Pool vandalism case LetMyPeopleVote Jul 2 #17
Bullshit. It won't hold up in court. Incredibly stupid of the Trump regime. They are desperate to find a scapegoat for Martin68 Jul 2 #21
I want to read the indictment! LeftInTX Jul 2 #22
To be another failed prosecution BeneteauBum Jul 2 #23
He was just helping to remove the paint. It all needs removed so he was helping. twodogsbarking Jul 2 #24
He says he didn't remove anything and I believe him. LisaL Jul 2 #25
Me too but it does all need removed. twodogsbarking Jul 2 #37
Well, if he gets thirty-three more felonies, he can run for president Grim Chieftain Jul 2 #27
Jury nullification is written all over this case. oasis Jul 2 #29
I don't see why jury nullification should be needed in this case. LisaL Jul 2 #30
Jurors will have already made up their minds oasis Jul 2 #35
The magnitude of... GiqueCee Jul 2 #31
Waitaminnit - If the pool coating is so flimsy that he can destroy it "with his bare hands" then it's a complete failure NBachers Jul 2 #33
Tell the guy to start a Go Fund Me for legal expenses...... Bengus81 Jul 2 #36
He already has a star lawyer who immediately took up his case. drray23 Jul 2 #39
There is a gofundme for him. LisaL Jul 3 #58
Thanks! I would have put the bar higher and given the rest to a charity Bengus81 Jul 4 #62
Trump (Dumb) and Pirro (Dumber) democratsruletheday Jul 2 #38
Pathetic smoke and mirrors. They should be charging themselves for gross incompetence, and then driving a motorcade Karasu Jul 2 #40
If Judge Winebox is in charge he's got it licked Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jul 2 #41
Good Grief!!! Rhiannon12866 Jul 2 #45
More prosecutors selling their souls to keep their jobs. Wonder Why Jul 2 #47
They all are in the Trump regime...look no further that KashYAP Bengus81 Jul 3 #57
He was removing trash from the pool. BidenRocks Jul 2 #48
Yes, that is not vandalism purr-rat beauty Jul 2 #52
I'm surprised that he wasn't charged with a misdemeanor to avoid a jury. TomSlick Jul 2 #51
He could request a jury trial for a misdemeanor LeftInTX Jul 3 #54
What a grotesque miscarriage of justice... Hugin Jul 3 #55
This seems like a minor matter, but this could bring him down. mwb970 Jul 3 #59
I trust the justice system in this case. JohnnyRingo Jul 3 #60
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. Olympic canoeist Dav...»Reply #11