Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

oldmanlynn

(884 posts)

7. Why not have the judge review those documents or get a neutral party to review those documents and as long as the victim

Reply to JT45242 (Reply #3)

Fri Jul 3, 2026, 08:55 AM

Friday

The judge can appoint a neutral person to review those documents to make sure just the victims names are redacted and then as soon as she got that version of it, just have her release it. To act like only Trump and DOJ and FBI are allowed to break. The law is ludicrous.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Escape

23 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

DOJ declines to turn over additional Epstein files, says redactions were appropriate [View all] riversedge Friday OP

Congress passed a law requiring that the files be released. . love_katz Friday #1

To fascists with no regard for the law, it's always an option, especially if they aren't afraid of being held Karasu Friday #19

Well, gotta say, their reluctance to come clean and show all tells you all you need to know. calimary Friday #2

Will a judge actually put all of them including mango Mussolini in contempt? JT45242 Friday #3

Why not have the judge review those documents or get a neutral party to review those documents and as long as the victim oldmanlynn Friday #7

They might as well put it in neon lights: TRUMP IS NAMED IN THE FILES. Vinca Friday #4

Start suspending counsels' bar licenses. flvegan Friday #5

do more than that moonshinegnomie Friday #12

Seems like contempt of court, to me (nt) muriel_volestrangler Friday #14

For anybody else, but, not when protecting the rapist billionaire republianmushroom Friday #17

Over and over and over again...Some of these judges need to see the inside of a jail as well. travelingthrulife Yesterday #21

"the materials include sensitive victim information". Botany Friday #6

They will never release the Epstein files. Trump will start a nuclear war 1st. Botany Friday #8

Why would any judge in the US Old Crank Friday #9

What would be next step when the main law enforcement agency refuses to enforce laws? mdbl Friday #11

What is needed.... whyzayker Friday #10

No one is above the law. right, wink wink chuckle chuckle ha ha Ha Ha republianmushroom Friday #13

Ruh roh... 2naSalit Friday #15

The DOJ declines? Bayard Friday #16

Why doesn't ABC write "DOJ refuses" or "DOJ failed to.."? Yet another softball headline.about Trump criminality lostnfound 3 hrs ago #23

What bullshit orangecrush Friday #18

Where are the arrest warrants? Or can we all just ignore court orders now? travelingthrulife Yesterday #20

What is this "decline" shit? IL Dem 20 hrs ago #22