Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sop

(20,045 posts)
32. I could provide multiple sources to support my statement...NYT, WSJ, WaPo...but they're all behind a paywall.
Sun Jul 5, 2026, 01:53 PM
Sunday

As a final response to your "quibbling," I'll just quote what Joyce Vance wrote about what would be "immediately" triggered (or the moment it happened, not automatically) when the Supreme Court declined to hear Trump's appeal:

"When Donald Trump appealed the $5 million dollars the jury awarded to E. Jean Carroll in the first of her two defamation victories against him, he put that money, plus extra to cover interest, into escrow. The money would go to her immediately if the appeal terminated in her favor. Trump stipulated that would be the case if, once he asked the Supreme Court to hear his appeal on a writ of certiorari, they declined to do so, which would finalize the decision in Carroll’s favor. That’s exactly what happened on Monday. That means it’s time for Donald Trump to pay up."

"So of course, he did, right? He’d made an agreement and he honored it."

"Alas—and as you all undoubtedly anticipated—that did not happen. Donald Trump, in fact, did not honor his agreement. He was not, yet again, a gracious loser. He has not paid up. He owes Carroll $5,779,783.00, the amount of the judgment plus post-judgment interest. Instead, he wants to delay making the payment. It’s so on brand. But it’s not going to work this time."

"We know all of this because Carroll’s lawyer, the incomparable Robbie Kaplan, had to explain it all to a judge."

Continued at link:

https://joycevance.substack.com/p/the-women-who-told-trump-no

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Jesus fucking christ... buzzycrumbhunger Saturday #1
Well, seems like he's overcompensating for SOMETHING! calimary Saturday #10
The $5 million plus interest is sitting in an escrow account and is probably controlled by the court. The court should OGBuzz Saturday #2
Yes, a Court made Trump do that months ago. Weird they have not released it. riversedge Saturday #3
Isn't the money that is with the court Quanto Magnus Saturday #4
I think you might be thinking of the larger judgement, maybe $93mil? Buddyzbuddy Saturday #6
That is probably it Quanto Magnus Sunday #37
So many legal issues with the Felon, it's hard to keep track. Buddyzbuddy Sunday #38
You are correct that the money is held in a "registry" controlled by the court. There is a procedure for releasing it onenote Sunday #19
We will see on Tuesday but I have my doubts. Courts are afraid of Trump. Also she will probably never see the OGBuzz Sunday #35
All I expect to see on Tuesday is Trump's filing onenote Sunday #36
This silliness will be going on for years... Escape Saturday #5
you would be wrong about that NJCher Saturday #13
He can't the SCOTUS of the United States has ruled in that he is guilty Botany Saturday #7
The SOB wormed his way into $2bil. last year but won't pay what he owes. Buddyzbuddy Saturday #8
How much you got, Donald? calimary Saturday #9
Classic Abuse Example: littlemissmartypants Saturday #11
shithead can not control ANYTHING anymore, he LOST. dave99 Saturday #12
Not a lawyer? Carroll didn't just have to "ask" -- she had to file a motion. onenote Sunday #30
As part of his appeal Trump entered into an agreement with the court the funds would be disbursed directly to Carroll sop Saturday #14
That is not what the agreement provided. It set up a procedure for the release of the money - it is not "automatic." onenote Sunday #21
'Carroll v. Trump Stipulation and Order -- Document #210' sop Sunday #25
Key procedural provision onenote Sunday #26
"Attorney Roberta Kaplan cited a prior stipulation that payment would be due if the high court denied review." sop Sunday #28
What you actually stated: onenote Sunday #29
I could provide multiple sources to support my statement...NYT, WSJ, WaPo...but they're all behind a paywall. sop Sunday #32
So does that mean you think Carroll's lawyer doesn't know what she's doing? onenote Sunday #33
I'm sorry, you've lost me. sop Sunday #34
Judge Kaplan tells him to "pay up" and July 7th is the final final deadline FakeNoose Saturday #15
Wrong. The judge simply said that the deadline for Trump to file an opposition to Carroll's motion is July 7. onenote Saturday #16
When I defaulted on my student loans, the good people at PHEAA helped themselves to my paycheck Orrex Saturday #17
He gets a "say" because Carroll agreed to give him one. onenote Sunday #22
Thank you for that. Orrex Sunday #24
Deadbeat. Martin68 Saturday #18
Trump tries again to squirm out of paying E. Jean Carroll $5M: attorney LetMyPeopleVote Sunday #20
Judge slaps down Trump's latest dodge in E. Jean Carroll case LetMyPeopleVote Sunday #23
Once again, Raw Story gets its facts wrong. The court has not ordered payment to Carroll to be made on July 7 onenote Sunday #27
He cannot be allowed to build that WH "ballroom" bunker. This is exactly. mahina Sunday #31
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump tries again to dela...»Reply #32