Latest Breaking News

onenote

(46,420 posts)

35. The Judge's order hasn't been violated.

Reply to muriel_volestrangler (Reply #14)

Mon Jul 6, 2026, 06:27 PM

7 hrs ago

Notwithstanding what some seem to believe, Judge Sullivan's order expressly stated that Blanche had until July 2 to "either produce to the public the emails ....with sender and recipient names unredacted, or show cause why the redactions should not be removed." Blanche chose the second option and filed a show cause response.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.291779/gov.uscourts.dcd.291779.15.0_1.pdf

Judge Sullivan now is giving Phang the opportunity to respond to Blanche's response and, as per the usual procedure, Blanche gets an opportunity to reply to Phang.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

40 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

DOJ declines to turn over additional Epstein files, says redactions were appropriate [View all] riversedge Friday OP

Congress passed a law requiring that the files be released. . love_katz Friday #1

To fascists with no regard for the law, it's always an option, especially if they aren't afraid of being held Karasu Friday #19

Then arrest and jail somebody! 31st Street Bridge 13 hrs ago #30

Well, gotta say, their reluctance to come clean and show all tells you all you need to know. calimary Friday #2

do you think they released the most damaging files? rampartd 13 hrs ago #27

Will a judge actually put all of them including mango Mussolini in contempt? JT45242 Friday #3

Why not have the judge review those documents or get a neutral party to review those documents and as long as the victim oldmanlynn Friday #7

They might as well put it in neon lights: TRUMP IS NAMED IN THE FILES. Vinca Friday #4

Start suspending counsels' bar licenses. flvegan Friday #5

do more than that moonshinegnomie Friday #12

Seems like contempt of court, to me (nt) muriel_volestrangler Friday #14

For anybody else, but, not when protecting the rapist billionaire republianmushroom Friday #17

Over and over and over again...Some of these judges need to see the inside of a jail as well. travelingthrulife Saturday #21

The Judge's order hasn't been violated. onenote 7 hrs ago #35

"the materials include sensitive victim information". Botany Friday #6

They will never release the Epstein files. Trump will start a nuclear war 1st. Botany Friday #8

Why would any judge in the US Old Crank Friday #9

What would be next step when the main law enforcement agency refuses to enforce laws? mdbl Friday #11

What is needed.... whyzayker Friday #10

Upside down Whip-poor-will 13 hrs ago #31

Exactly duckworth969 13 hrs ago #33

No one is above the law. right, wink wink chuckle chuckle ha ha Ha Ha republianmushroom Friday #13

Ruh roh... 2naSalit Friday #15

The DOJ declines? Bayard Friday #16

Why doesn't ABC write "DOJ refuses" or "DOJ failed to.."? Yet another softball headline.about Trump criminality lostnfound Sunday #23

See post #35. onenote 7 hrs ago #36

What bullshit orangecrush Friday #18

Where are the arrest warrants? Or can we all just ignore court orders now? travelingthrulife Saturday #20

See post #35. onenote 7 hrs ago #37

What is this "decline" shit? IL Dem Saturday #22

Right? ck4829 13 hrs ago #25

Wrong. See post #35. onenote 7 hrs ago #38

This cover-up is almost as bad as the job market. What are they hiding? ck4829 13 hrs ago #24

Trump is mentioned in the files more times than Jesus is mentioned in the Bible Blues Heron 13 hrs ago #26

I guess Trump is guilty, guilty guilty. But he's got to protect his "friends" Walleye 13 hrs ago #28

It was an order, not a request. C_U_L8R 13 hrs ago #29

See post #35. onenote 7 hrs ago #39

Thanks for setting us amateurs straight :-)) C_U_L8R 6 hrs ago #40

So what they are saying is 'trump'.... sheshe2 13 hrs ago #32

Is it a dictatorship yet? Stacey Grove 8 hrs ago #34