you knew had errors because the reviews pointed out it had errors. That's equivalent to the AI videos on that YouTube channel. Which are done to make money, and which take attention and money away from people who care about the subjects of their videos and don't use AI.
At the very least, please check the YouTube comments and let DUers know that a video you're posting is AI-generated and the YouTube comments point out some errors. The AI videos on that channel don't seem as atrocious as some I've seen (I checked some more), but according to YouTube comments on those videos, there are a lot of pronunciation errors, locations being shown on the entirely wrong place on maps, and video and photos showing something other than what they're supposed to show.
I'll always choose real writers, filmmakers, musicians, visual artists and actors over AI fraud and plagiarism. The creatives I've known have nothing against helpful tech. But there are very few creatives who are okay with the theft of the world's intellectual property that's the only reason genAI has any value at all.
Posting AI slop is an insult to every real creative out there. GenAI isn't a tool for artists - it's a fraud generator, built on theft, designed for pretense.
And heaven us the musicians using sounds from other musicians LP's for mixes for their music.
If they sample too much, they can and will and should be sued for it, sometimes paying millions.
I can't believe you're comparing AI slop to Shakespeare.
= new reply since forum marked as read