Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

John ONeill

(93 posts)
17. Breeding in Candus
Sun May 3, 2026, 07:38 AM
May 3

The ANEEL fuel intended to burn thorium in Candus needs HALEU at 12 to 20% fissile as a starter for each fuel bundle (or equivalent concentration of plutonium), and will not be a true breeder, with conversion ratios below 1.0. CopAtomx should get much better neutron economy even than a Candu -
1/ there's no xenon 135 in the core, it's rapidly outgassed from the salt, just from vapour pressure, at 700 C
2/ Unlike with an ANEEL fuel bundle, there's no high neutron cross section protactinium in the core (it's all in the blanket, and with the thorium to protactinium ratio there at about 1000 to one, parasitic neutron losses should be low)
3/ the spherical core geometry, with heavy water inside and around it, and a breeding blanket round that, minimises leakage.
CA claim they can breed with 5% LEU (or equivalent in transuranics), at about 1.1 breeding ratio once they fully convert to U233, and so grow more quickly than a fast reactor fleet. If they fail, there are plenty of fast neutron contenders - Russia's BREST 300 and BN1200, Newcleo in France and Italy, Terrapower's Natrium in Wyoming, Blykalla in Sweden - but thermal spectrum reactors so far have had a better operational record. Maybe even Japan's reduced moderation boiling water concept could breed ... but nobody's working on that, CA have hardware nearly ready for low power fission testing.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Thanks. Sadly, I believe we've waited too long and we're toast. surfered May 1 #1
This is true. I went to a lecture last night by a scientist last night which focused on getting people to... NNadir May 1 #2
Commentary: Nuclear power must be part of New York's energy solution OKIsItJustMe May 1 #3
Dr. Hansen and I agree on nuclear energy. I disagree that so called "renewable energy" is worth the land and money... NNadir May 1 #4
Fortunately you don't make decisions for the world OKIsItJustMe May 1 #5
Where are these nasty "anti-nuke" cultists anyway? thought crime Monday #21
In response to this question, I would like to state that a mirror is useful device. NNadir Monday #22
Hansen advocates for both renewables and nuclear energy thought crime May 1 #6
He's right about one; wrong about the other. It is inexcusable to spend trillions of dollars on so called... NNadir May 2 #8
IEA: Rapid clean energy deployment displaces fossil fuels and lowers emissions OKIsItJustMe May 2 #11
Hansen John ONeill May 2 #7
Copenhagen Atomics is an interesting little company with which I have passing familiarity. I'm mostly amused... NNadir May 2 #9
Breeding in Candus John ONeill May 3 #17
A Candu would not need HALEU in the case where it is started by plutonium. Outgassing Xe will change... NNadir May 3 #18
Transatomic .. John ONeill May 3 #19
OK. I went to their webpage and looked. Their "spin" is lithium isotope... NNadir Monday #23
Bookmarking.nt jfz9580m May 2 #10
A world economy powered by renewable energy may have been plausible fifty years ago... hunter May 2 #12
It hasn't been possible since the 19th century, which was when it was abandoned for a reason. NNadir May 2 #13
I say plausible because the actual capabilities of renewable energy were still unknown. hunter May 3 #15
Fair enough. I fully confess that there was a time I thought it reasonable. NNadir May 3 #16
I would argue that it is more plausible today, but not practical OKIsItJustMe May 2 #14
It's just getting started. Approaching 'critical mass' and it's Fun to watch it happening now. thought crime May 3 #20
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Climate Scientist James H...»Reply #17