Welcome to DU!
    The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
    Join the community:
    Create a free account
    Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
    Become a Star Member
    Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
    All Forums
        Issue Forums
        Culture Forums
        Alliance Forums
        Region Forums
        Support Forums
        Help & Search
    
Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: Conspiracy v. fact 9/11 [View all]tomk52
(46 posts)37. Yup, I didn't think you understood either one.
        Would you please answer my questions. Simply & directly. 
That would be courteous.
After you do this, I'll happily explain why your first NIST quote is a gross misunderstanding of what NIST really said.
And why your second sentence is 100% wrong.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
  Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
						
							82 replies
							
								 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					
                     = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
 = new reply since forum marked as read
							
						
      
      
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
						RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
					
                    
					
        
        The engines of the plane that hit the Pentagon energetically dissasembled themselves when they diges
        AtheistCrusader
        Feb 2013
        #2
      
        
        Um, the south tower core columns up to floor 50 or so are visible standing in the dust
        AtheistCrusader
        May 2013
        #78
      
        
        Luckily, there's VIDEO of that exceedingly short period of time. Remember that? nt
        greyl
        Mar 2013
        #22
      
        
        That is the 10' EXIT hole in the Pentagon E ring - not the entrance hole in the facade.
        hack89
        Mar 2013
        #50
      
        
        You cannot reason a person out of a position he did not reason himself into in the first place
        stevebreeze
        May 2013
        #76
      
        
        There's nothing resembling sound premises or valid logical inferences in your argument
        William Seger
        Mar 2013
        #59
      
  