Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Lionel Mandrake

(4,183 posts)
1. Association does not imply causation.
Fri Sep 26, 2025, 01:45 PM
Sep 26

Suppose in a study of Ntotal random births, it is found that
N(A) offspring are autistic;
N(T) mothers took Tylenol (aka acetaminophen or paracetamol); and
N(AT) mothers tookTylenol AND had autistic kids.
There is a link, or association, if
N(AT)/Ntotal >> (N(A)/Ntotal ) (N(T)/Ntotal ),
where >> means significantly greater than.
Some studies have shown such a link, but this is not evidence of causation. It is known that a pregnant woman's fever can cause autism and other problems. The association between autism and Tylenol should not come as a big surprise, because when a pregnant woman has a fever she is very likely to take Tylenol.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Mount Sinai study support...»Reply #1