Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cable News Clips

hlthe2b

(115,430 posts)

1. There is so much in that bill that is either unconstitutional, already in violation of current court

Reply to Uncle Joe (Original post)

Wed Jul 1, 2026, 11:48 AM

Jul 1

opinions re: related executive orders, in violation of current state or Federal laws, or just impossible to enact given the burden on the American voters and officials and volunteer poll workers implementing any changes. If that ridiculous monstrous bill passed, it would take minimal time for a nation-wide injunction, IMO. And that opinion is not without company...

Surely there are lawyers in Congress that would tell them that? I know the WH lawyers are worthless, but...

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

1 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court Approves Mail-In Voting, But Trump Keeps Pushing Extremist SAVE Act Ahead of Midterms [View all] Uncle Joe Jul 1 OP

There is so much in that bill that is either unconstitutional, already in violation of current court hlthe2b Jul 1 #1