Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Ocelot II

(131,964 posts)

2. No, they didn't. The dissenters interpreted the 14th Amendment as meaning citizenship is based on domicile

Reply to Mysterian (Original post)

Tue Jun 30, 2026, 11:22 AM

Tuesday

not just on physical presence in the US. It's an absurd interpretation but it doesn't mean the Constitution can be annulled by executive order. And Alito didn't retire; NPR retracted the story.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Wednesdays scipan

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Three justices on the U.S. Supreme Court ruled a president can annul the constitution by executive order [View all] Mysterian Tuesday OP

Yet, President Biden couldn't end student loan debt. Chasstev365 Tuesday #1

No, they didn't. The dissenters interpreted the 14th Amendment as meaning citizenship is based on domicile Ocelot II Tuesday #2

Yes, they did Mysterian Tuesday #3

There is absolutely no way Alito would quit LR3 Tuesday #4

NPR reported he retired, then retracted Mysterian Tuesday #5

Yes, his retirement would not offer any opportunity for the appointment of a better replacement. Ocelot II Tuesday #6