Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

ancianita

(43,363 posts)

3. RIGHT? Maybe "enough" evidence had to be collected before a federal judge could rule FOR due process. And what a

Reply to riversedge (Reply #1)

Tue May 19, 2026, 11:11 AM

Yesterday

bad justice timeline of enforcement this really is. So bad that if Dems win back Congress, they have to reform the Third Branch to not just expand the SCOTUS, but put a timeline on federal judge decisions when court proceedings conclude by jury or final arguments.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Katcat

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Federal judge bans most arrests by federal agents in immigration courts in New York [View all] SouthBayDem Yesterday OP

I am wondering why this was not done on day ONE?? riversedge Yesterday #1

There had to be, unfortunatly, plantiffs to file against the apricothellbeast minions irisblue Yesterday #2

RIGHT? Maybe "enough" evidence had to be collected before a federal judge could rule FOR due process. And what a ancianita Yesterday #3