Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

thought crime

(1,508 posts)
3. No mad science please.
Mon Mar 16, 2026, 04:31 PM
Yesterday

Your contempt for non-scientists comes through loud and clear. We should indeed listen to scientists, but not only scientists, and we should certainly not listen too carefully to mad, bitter and paranoid scientists who lack the ability to factor in economic, engineering and social constraints and who blame current “anti-nukes” for cold-war propaganda about radiation backed up by the actual existence of nuclear exclusion zones and a lack of ability to solve the problem of nuclear waste in an acceptable way. Something tells me the general public, scientifically literate or not, is not going to accept the notion of using nuclear waste to irradiate the air. Yeah, call me stupid. Doesn’t matter because it just won’t happen. Neither will the completely unrealistic fantasy of a world relying solely on nuclear energy. That sounds a bit Edward Tellerish. A better way to manage your disappointment would be to lighten up and jump on the Fusion train.

Meanwhile, countries like China, Japan and Korea just got a new reason to reduce their dependence on oil and to continue innovative development of renewable energy and use of hydrogen fuel. And to go ahead and build some nuclear plants, too, if it helps.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»The Biogeochemical Fate o...»Reply #3